As Introduced                            1            

122nd General Assembly                                             4            

   Regular Session                                   S. B. No. 83  5            

      1997-1998                                                    6            


                       SENATOR B. JOHNSON                          8            


                                                                   10           

                           A   B I L L                                          

             To enact sections 765.01 to 765.08 of the Revised     12           

                Code to authorize municipal corporations to        13           

                establish noncriminal land use infractions, to                  

                provide civil enforcement procedures for any such  14           

                land use infractions established, and to                        

                authorize the establishment of land use            15           

                violations bureaus to deal with such infractions.  16           




BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF OHIO:        17           

      Section 1.  That sections 765.01, 765.02, 765.03, 765.04,    19           

765.05, 765.06, 765.07, and 765.08 of the Revised Code be enacted  20           

to read as follows:                                                             

      Sec. 765.01.  AS USED IN THIS CHAPTER:                       22           

      (A)  "LAND USE INFRACTION" MEANS A VIOLATION OF ANY          24           

BUILDING, HOUSING, AIR POLLUTION, SANITATION, HEALTH, FIRE,        25           

ZONING, OR SAFETY CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION THAT  26           

IS APPLICABLE TO PREMISES USED OR INTENDED FOR USE AS A PLACE OF   27           

HUMAN HABITATION, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, OR ANY OTHER REAL         28           

PROPERTY SUBJECT TO SUCH A CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR                      

REGULATION AND THAT IS ENACTED BY A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, OR A    29           

VIOLATION OF ANY CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION        30           

ENACTED BY A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AS AUTHORIZED BY THIS CHAPTER,  31           

IF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN EITHER OF THESE CASES ALSO HAS     32           

ENACTED A CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION OF THE TYPE   33           

DESCRIBED IN DIVISION (A) OF SECTION 765.02 OF THE REVISED CODE    34           

IN RELATION TO THE PARTICULAR REGULATORY CODE, ORDINANCE,          36           

RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION.                                         37           

                                                          2      

                                                                 
      (B)  "COURT" MEANS A MUNICIPAL COURT, COUNTY COURT, OR       40           

MAYOR'S COURT, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED AS ONE OF THESE      41           

COURTS, IN WHICH CASE IT MEANS THE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED COURT.  42           

      (C)  "LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER" MEANS A LAW ENFORCEMENT       44           

OFFICER AS DEFINED IN SECTION 2901.01 OF THE REVISED CODE, CODE    45           

ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, BUILDING INSPECTOR, OR OTHER OFFICER          46           

AUTHORIZED TO ENFORCE ANY CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR                       

REGULATION DESCRIBED IN DIVISION (A) OF THIS SECTION.              47           

      Sec. 765.02.  (A)  A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THAT ENACTS ANY   49           

CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION DESCRIBED IN DIVISION   50           

(A) OF SECTION 765.01 OF THE REVISED CODE ALSO MAY SPECIFY BY      51           

CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION THAT A VIOLATION OF     52           

THE REGULATORY CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION SHALL    53           

NOT BE CONSIDERED A CRIMINAL OFFENSE FOR ANY PURPOSE, THAT A       54           

PERSON WHO COMMITS THE VIOLATION SHALL NOT BE ARRESTED AS A        55           

RESULT OF THE COMMISSION OF THE VIOLATION, AND THAT THE VIOLATION  56           

SHALL BE HANDLED PURSUANT TO THIS CHAPTER.  IF SUCH A              57           

SPECIFICATION IS MADE, THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ALSO SHALL ADOPT  58           

BY CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION A FINE FOR A         60           

VIOLATION OF THE REGULATORY CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR        61           

REGULATION AND PRESCRIBE AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OR PENALTIES FOR    62           

FAILURE TO ANSWER ANY CHARGES OF THE VIOLATION IN A TIMELY         63           

MANNER.  IN NO CASE SHALL ANY FINE ADOPTED OR ADDITIONAL PENALTY   65           

PRESCRIBED PURSUANT TO THIS DIVISION EXCEED ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS,   66           

PLUS COSTS AND OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES, PER VIOLATION.        67           

      (B)  A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THAT ENACTS ANY CODE,           69           

ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION UNDER DIVISION (A) OF THIS    70           

SECTION ALSO SHALL ENACT A CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR         71           

REGULATION THAT SPECIFIES THE TIME WITHIN WHICH A PERSON WHO IS    72           

ISSUED A TICKET MUST ANSWER IN RELATION TO THE LAND USE            73           

INFRACTION CHARGED IN THE TICKET.                                  74           

      Sec. 765.03.  (A)  EACH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THAT ENACTS    76           

ANY CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION UNDER DIVISION (A)  77           

OF SECTION 765.02 OF THE REVISED CODE SHALL ADOPT A TICKET TO BE   79           

                                                          3      

                                                                 
USED BY ITS LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.  THIS TICKET SHALL BE THE                 

SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FOR PURPOSES OF THIS CHAPTER.                81           

      (B)  THE TICKET ADOPTED BY A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UNDER     84           

DIVISION (A) OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE USED BY ITS LAW ENFORCEMENT  85           

OFFICERS IN ALL CASES IN WHICH A PERSON IS CHARGED WITH            86           

COMMITTING A LAND USE INFRACTION IN ITS JURISDICTION.  EACH                     

TICKET SHALL CONTAIN PROVISIONS THAT ADVISE THE PERSON UPON WHOM   88           

IT IS SERVED THAT THE PERSON MUST ANSWER IN RELATION TO THE LAND   89           

USE INFRACTION CHARGED IN THE TICKET AND THAT CERTAIN PENALTIES    90           

MAY RESULT FROM A FAILURE TO TIMELY ANSWER, INDICATE THE           91           

ALLOWABLE ANSWERS THAT MAY BE MADE AND THAT THE PERSON WILL BE     92           

AFFORDED A HEARING IF THE PERSON DENIES IN THE ANSWER THAT THE     93           

PERSON COMMITTED THE LAND USE INFRACTION, SPECIFY THE ENTITY TO    95           

WHICH, THE TIME WITHIN WHICH, AND THE ALLOWABLE MANNERS IN WHICH   96           

THE ANSWER MUST BE MADE, INDICATE THE PENALTIES THAT MAY RESULT    97           

FROM FAILURE TO TIMELY ANSWER AND THE FINE THAT ARISES FROM THE    98           

LAND USE INFRACTION, WARN THAT FAILURE TO TIMELY ANSWER OR TO      99           

APPEAR AT A REQUESTED HEARING WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ADMISSION OF   100          

THE LAND USE INFRACTION, AND WARN THAT A DEFAULT CIVIL JUDGMENT    101          

POTENTIALLY MAY BE ENTERED AGAINST THE PERSON.                                  

      (C)  A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHO ISSUES A TICKET FOR A     104          

LAND USE INFRACTION SHALL COMPLETE THE TICKET BY IDENTIFYING THE   105          

LAND USE INFRACTION CHARGED AND INDICATING THE DATE, TIME, AND     106          

PLACE OF THE INFRACTION.  THE OFFICER SHALL SIGN THE TICKET AND    107          

AFFIRM THE FACTS IT CONTAINS.  IF THE OFFENDER IS PRESENT, THE     108          

OFFICER ALSO SHALL RECORD ON THE TICKET THE NAME OF THE OFFENDER   109          

IN A SPACE PROVIDED ON THE TICKET FOR IDENTIFICATION OF THE        110          

OFFENDER, AND THEN SHALL PERSONALLY SERVE THE TICKET UPON THE      111          

OFFENDER.  IF THE OFFENDER IS NOT PRESENT, THE OFFICER SHALL       112          

INSERT THE WORD "OFFENDER" IN THE SPACE PROVIDED ON THE TICKET     113          

FOR IDENTIFICATION OF THE OFFENDER, AND THEN SHALL CONSTRUCTIVELY  114          

SERVE THE TICKET UPON THE OFFENDER BY AFFIXING THE TICKET TO THE   115          

AFFECTED REAL PROPERTY IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE.                     116          

      CONSTRUCTIVE SERVICE OF A TICKET BY AFFIXATION AS PROVIDED   119          

                                                          4      

                                                                 
IN THIS DIVISION HAS THE SAME FORCE AND EFFECT, AND POTENTIALLY    121          

SUBJECTS THE OFFENDER WHOSE ACT OR OMISSION RESULTED IN THE LAND   123          

USE INFRACTION TO THE SAME FINE AND THE SAME PENALTIES FOR         124          

FAILURE TO TIMELY ANSWER OR TO APPEAR, IF A HEARING IS REQUESTED,  125          

AS IF THE TICKET WERE PERSONALLY SERVED ON THE OFFENDER AT THE     126          

TIME OF THE VIOLATION.                                             127          

      (D)  THE ORIGINAL OF A TICKET ISSUED UNDER THIS SECTION OR   130          

ANY TRUE COPY OF IT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RECORD KEPT IN THE       131          

ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND OF    132          

THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY WHOSE OFFICER ISSUED IT, AND SHALL BE   133          

PRIMA-FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE FACTS IT CONTAINS.                                  

      (E)  WHEN A TICKET IS ISSUED FOR A LAND USE INFRACTION AND   136          

IS SERVED UNDER THIS SECTION, THE OFFENDER WHOSE ACT OR OMISSION   137          

RESULTED IN THE INFRACTION FOR WHICH THE TICKET WAS ISSUED IS      139          

LIABLE FOR THE INFRACTION AND FOR ANY FINE OR PENALTY ARISING OUT  140          

OF THE INFRACTION UNDER A CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR                       

REGULATION ENACTED BY THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UNDER DIVISION     142          

(A) OF SECTION 765.02 OF THE REVISED CODE.                                      

      (F)  NO PERSON UPON WHOM A TICKET CHARGING A LAND USE        145          

INFRACTION IS PERSONALLY OR CONSTRUCTIVELY SERVED UNDER THIS       146          

SECTION SHALL BE ARRESTED AS A RESULT OF THE COMMISSION OF THE     147          

LAND USE INFRACTION.                                                            

      Sec. 765.04.  (A)(1)  THE LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY OF A         149          

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BY ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION, MAY REQUEST     151          

THE MUNICIPAL COURT OR COUNTY COURT HAVING TERRITORIAL             152          

JURISDICTION OVER THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION TO AUTHORIZE THE       153          

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION TO ESTABLISH A LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU    154          

TO HANDLE ALL LAND USE INFRACTIONS OCCURRING WITHIN THE TERRITORY  155          

OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, INCLUDING LAND USE INFRACTIONS THAT  157          

ARE VIOLATIONS OF CODES, ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, OR REGULATIONS   158          

OF OTHER MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AND THAT OCCUR WITHIN THE          159          

TERRITORY OF THE REQUESTING MUNICIPAL CORPORATION.                              

      (2)  THE LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITIES OF TWO OR MORE MUNICIPAL    161          

CORPORATIONS THAT ARE WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE   163          

                                                          5      

                                                                 
SAME MUNICIPAL COURT OR COUNTY COURT MAY JOIN TOGETHER AND, BY     164          

ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION, REQUEST THE MUNICIPAL COURT OR COUNTY     165          

COURT TO AUTHORIZE THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS TO JOINTLY           166          

ESTABLISH A JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU TO HANDLE ALL LAND    167          

USE INFRACTIONS OCCURRING WITHIN THE TERRITORIES OF THE MUNICIPAL  168          

CORPORATIONS THAT HAVE JOINED TOGETHER IN MAKING THE REQUEST,      170          

INCLUDING LAND USE INFRACTIONS THAT ARE VIOLATIONS OF CODES,       171          

ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, OR REGULATIONS OF OTHER MUNICIPAL         172          

CORPORATIONS AND THAT OCCUR WITHIN THE TERRITORIES OF THE                       

MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS MAKING THE REQUEST.                         173          

      (B)  A REQUEST MADE UNDER DIVISION (A) OF THIS SECTION       176          

SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE MUNICIPAL COURT OR COUNTY     177          

COURT.  UPON THE FILING OF SUCH A REQUEST, THE COURT, BY JOURNAL                

ENTRY, SHALL AUTHORIZE THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THAT MADE THE     179          

REQUEST, OR THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS THAT JOINED TOGETHER IN     181          

MAKING THE REQUEST, TO ESTABLISH A LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR   182          

TO JOINTLY ESTABLISH A JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU.  UPON     183          

THE GRANT OF SUCH AUTHORITY BY A COURT, THE MUNICIPAL              184          

CORPORATION, OR THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS THAT JOINED TOGETHER,   185          

MAY ESTABLISH THE LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINTLY ESTABLISH  186          

THE JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU.                              187          

      Sec. 765.05.  (A)  IF A LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR A      189          

JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU IS ESTABLISHED UNDER SECTION      191          

765.04 OF THE REVISED CODE, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION    193          

OF LAW TO THE CONTRARY, THE BUREAU OR JOINT BUREAU HAS                          

JURISDICTION OVER EACH LAND USE INFRACTION THAT IS A VIOLATION OF  194          

A CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION OF ANY MUNICIPAL      195          

CORPORATION AND THAT OCCURS WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE MUNICIPAL  196          

CORPORATION THAT ESTABLISHED THE BUREAU OR THE TERRITORY OF ANY    198          

OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS THAT JOINED TOGETHER TO JOINTLY      200          

ESTABLISH THE JOINT BUREAU, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE MUNICIPAL    201          

CORPORATION WAS THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THAT ESTABLISHED THE     202          

BUREAU OR WAS ONE OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS THAT JOINED        203          

TOGETHER TO JOINTLY ESTABLISH THE JOINT BUREAU.  NOTWITHSTANDING   204          

                                                          6      

                                                                 
ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW TO THE CONTRARY, EACH LAND USE          205          

INFRACTION THAT IS A VIOLATION OF A CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION,   206          

OR REGULATION OF ANY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND THAT OCCURS WITHIN  207          

THE JURISDICTION OF THE BUREAU OR THE JOINT BUREAU, AND THE        208          

ENFORCEMENT OF EACH SUCH LAND USE INFRACTION, SHALL BE HANDLED     209          

PURSUANT TO AND BE GOVERNED BY THIS CHAPTER.                       210          

      THE OPERATING COSTS OF A LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU SHALL    212          

BE PAID BY THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THAT ESTABLISHES IT.  THE     214          

OPERATING COSTS OF A JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU SHALL BE     215          

PAID BY ALL OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS THAT JOINTLY ESTABLISH   216          

IT, IN THE PROPORTIONS AGREED UPON BY THE LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITIES  217          

OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS.  THE LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY OF THE   218          

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THAT ESTABLISHES A LAND USE VIOLATIONS       219          

BUREAU AND THE LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITIES OF ALL OF THE MUNICIPAL     220          

CORPORATIONS THAT JOINTLY ESTABLISH A JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS    222          

BUREAU, BY AGREEMENT, SHALL APPOINT A VIOLATIONS CLERK FOR THE     223          

BUREAU OR JOINT BUREAU, AND, SUBJECT TO THE EXCEPTION PROVIDED IN  224          

THIS DIVISION, SHALL APPOINT HEARING EXAMINERS AND NECESSARY       225          

CLERICAL EMPLOYEES FOR THE BUREAU OR JOINT BUREAU.  THE            226          

LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THAT            227          

ESTABLISHES A BUREAU AND THE LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITIES OF ALL OF     228          

THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS THAT JOINTLY ESTABLISH A JOINT BUREAU,  229          

BY AGREEMENT, MAY DELEGATE ITS OR THEIR DUTY TO APPOINT EITHER     230          

HEARING EXAMINERS OR NECESSARY CLERICAL PERSONNEL, OR BOTH, TO     231          

THE VIOLATIONS CLERK APPOINTED FOR THE BUREAU OR JOINT BUREAU, IN  232          

WHICH CASE THE VIOLATIONS CLERK, UPON APPOINTMENT, SHALL MAKE      233          

THOSE APPOINTMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DELEGATION.  NO PERSON   234          

SHALL BE EMPLOYED AS A HEARING EXAMINER UNLESS THE PERSON IS AN    235          

ATTORNEY ADMITTED TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW IN THIS STATE OR          236          

FORMERLY WAS EMPLOYED AS A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.                237          

      THE FINE AND PENALTIES ESTABLISHED FOR A LAND USE            239          

INFRACTION BY ANY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL BE COLLECTED,        240          

RETAINED, AND DISBURSED BY THE VIOLATIONS CLERK IF THE LAND USE    241          

INFRACTION OUT OF WHICH THE FINE OR PENALTIES AROSE OCCURRED       242          

                                                          7      

                                                                 
WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE BUREAU OR JOINT BUREAU.  THE FINE   243          

AND PENALTIES COLLECTED BY A VIOLATIONS CLERK FOR A LAND USE       244          

INFRACTION SHALL BE DISBURSED BY THE CLERK TO THE MUNICIPAL        245          

CORPORATION WHOSE CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION WAS   246          

VIOLATED.                                                                       

      (B)  IF A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DOES NOT ENACT A CODE,       248          

ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION OF THE TYPE DESCRIBED IN      249          

DIVISION (A) OF SECTION 765.02 OF THE REVISED CODE IN RELATION TO  250          

A CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION ENACTED BY THE        251          

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THAT IS DESCRIBED IN DIVISION (A) OF         252          

SECTION 765.01 OF THE REVISED CODE, A VIOLATION OF THE PARTICULAR  253          

REGULATORY CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION IS NOT A     255          

LAND USE INFRACTION FOR PURPOSES OF THIS CHAPTER.                  256          

      (C)  A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THAT ESTABLISHES A LAND USE     259          

VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS OR THAT JOINTLY    260          

ESTABLISH A JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU MAY CONTRACT WITH     261          

ANY GOVERNMENTAL OR NONGOVERNMENTAL ENTITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES IN  262          

PROCESSING, COLLECTING, AND ENFORCING TICKETS ISSUED BY LAW        263          

ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND CIVIL JUDGMENTS AND DEFAULT CIVIL         264          

JUDGMENTS ENTERED UNDER THIS CHAPTER.                              265          

      Sec. 765.06.  (A)  A PERSON WHO IS PERSONALLY OR             267          

CONSTRUCTIVELY SERVED WITH A TICKET CHARGING THE COMMISSION OF A   269          

LAND USE INFRACTION MAY ANSWER THE CHARGE BY PERSONAL APPEARANCE   270          

BEFORE THE LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINT LAND USE            271          

VIOLATIONS BUREAU, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, OR BY MAIL.  A         272          

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MAY, BY CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR      273          

REGULATION, ALSO AUTHORIZE THE ANSWER TO A CHARGE OF A LAND USE    274          

INFRACTION THAT IS A VIOLATION OF ANY OF ITS CODES, ORDINANCES,    275          

RESOLUTIONS, OR REGULATIONS TO BE MADE BY TELEPHONE, IN WHICH      276          

CASE THE TICKET ADOPTED BY THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL         277          

INDICATE THAT FACT.  AN ANSWER SHALL BE MADE WITHIN THE TIME       278          

SPECIFIED BY THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND INDICATED ON THE        279          

TICKET, AND SHALL BE IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FORMS:                             

      (1)  AN ADMISSION THAT THE PERSON COMMITTED THE LAND USE     281          

                                                          8      

                                                                 
INFRACTION, BY PAYMENT OF ANY FINE ARISING OUT OF THE INFRACTION;  283          

      (2)  AN ADMISSION THAT THE PERSON COMMITTED THE LAND USE     285          

INFRACTION, WITH AN EXPLANATION OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING   286          

THE LAND USE INFRACTION;                                           287          

      (3)  A DENIAL THAT THE PERSON COMMITTED THE LAND USE         289          

INFRACTION AND A REQUEST FOR A HEARING RELATIVE TO THE             290          

INFRACTION.  IF THE PERSON DESIRES THE PRESENCE, AT THE HEARING,   291          

OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHO ISSUED THE TICKET, THE PERSON   293          

MUST REQUEST THE OFFICER'S PRESENCE IN THE PERSON'S ANSWER.        294          

      (B)(1)  A PERSON WHO ADMITS HAVING COMMITTED A LAND USE      296          

INFRACTION SHALL, AND A PERSON WHO ADMITS HAVING COMMITTED A LAND  299          

USE INFRACTION WITH EXPLANATION MAY, WHEN ANSWERING, PAY THE FINE  300          

ARISING OUT OF THE INFRACTION ADMITTED TO THE VIOLATIONS CLERK OF  302          

THE BUREAU TO WHICH THE ANSWER IS MADE.                            303          

      (2)  A PERSON WHO ADMITS HAVING COMMITTED A LAND USE         305          

INFRACTION WITH EXPLANATION SHALL SUBMIT EVIDENCE TO THE BUREAU    306          

TO WHICH THE ANSWER IS MADE THAT EXPLAINS THE CIRCUMSTANCES        308          

SURROUNDING THE INFRACTION.  THE EVIDENCE MAY BE SUBMITTED IN      309          

PERSON OR, TO AVOID THE NECESSITY OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE, MAY BE   310          

SENT AS AFFIDAVITS AND OTHER DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE, BY MAIL.  A     311          

BUREAU THAT RECEIVES AN ANSWER ADMITTING THAT A PERSON COMMITTED   312          

A LAND USE INFRACTION WITH EXPLANATION SHALL PROMPTLY DETERMINE    313          

WHETHER THE EXPLANATION MITIGATES THE FACT THAT THE PERSON         314          

COMMITTED THE INFRACTION AND NOTIFY THE PERSON, IN WRITING, OF     315          

ITS DETERMINATION.                                                 316          

      IF THE BUREAU DETERMINES THAT THE EXPLANATION MITIGATES THE  319          

FACT THAT THE PERSON COMMITTED THE INFRACTION, THE BUREAU SHALL    320          

ELIMINATE OR REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF THE FINE ARISING OUT OF THE      321          

INFRACTION.  IF THE FINE IS ELIMINATED OR REDUCED AND THE PERSON   322          

HAS PREVIOUSLY PAID THE FINE, THE AMOUNT PAID IN EXCESS OF THE     323          

REVISED FINE SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE PERSON; IF THE FINE IS       324          

ELIMINATED OR REDUCED AND THE PERSON HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY PAID THE   325          

FINE, THE PERSON SHALL PAY ONLY THE AMOUNT OF THE REVISED FINE.    326          

IF THE BUREAU DETERMINES THAT THE EXPLANATION DOES NOT MITIGATE    328          

                                                          9      

                                                                 
THE FACT THAT THE PERSON COMMITTED THE INFRACTION, THE PERSON      329          

OWES THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF THE FINE ARISING OUT OF THE INFRACTION,  330          

AND IF THE PERSON HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY PAID THE FINE, THE PERSON     331          

SHALL PAY THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF THE FINE.  IF A PERSON ADMITS       332          

HAVING COMMITTED A LAND USE INFRACTION WITH EXPLANATION AND THE    334          

PERSON FAILS TO PAY THE AMOUNT OF THE FINE DUE WITHIN TEN DAYS     335          

AFTER RECEIVING NOTICE OF THE BUREAU'S DETERMINATION, UNLESS THE   336          

AMOUNT DUE HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN PAID, THE BUREAU'S DETERMINATION    338          

AND THE AMOUNT OF THE FINE DUE SHALL BE CONSIDERED A JUDGMENT AND  339          

SHALL BE TREATED AS IF IT WERE A JUDGMENT RENDERED SUBSEQUENT TO   340          

A HEARING HELD UNDER DIVISION (B) OF SECTION 765.08 OF THE         341          

REVISED CODE.                                                                   

      (3)  A PERSON WHO DENIES HAVING COMMITTED A LAND USE         343          

INFRACTION SHALL BE GRANTED A HEARING CONCERNING THE INFRACTION.   344          

THE BUREAU SHALL SET A DATE FOR THE HEARING AND NOTIFY THE         346          

PERSON, IN WRITING, OF THE DATE, TIME, AND PLACE OF THE HEARING.   347          

THE HEARING SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY A HEARING EXAMINER OF THE LAND   348          

USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU IN       349          

ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 765.08 OF THE REVISED CODE.                350          

      (C)  IF A PERSON WHO IS PERSONALLY OR CONSTRUCTIVELY SERVED  352          

WITH A TICKET CHARGING THE COMMISSION OF A LAND USE INFRACTION     354          

FAILS TO TIMELY ANSWER THE CHARGE, AS PROVIDED IN DIVISION (A) OF  355          

THIS SECTION, THE LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINT LAND USE     356          

VIOLATIONS BUREAU, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, SHALL ISSUE THE                     

PROPER NOTIFICATIONS OF INFRACTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 765.07 OF   357          

THE REVISED CODE, AND PROCEED ACCORDING TO THAT SECTION.  FAILURE  359          

TO TIMELY ANSWER A CHARGE MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF THE      360          

ADDITIONAL PENALTIES PRESCRIBED BY CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION,    361          

OR REGULATION OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ENACTED UNDER SECTION   362          

765.02 OF THE REVISED CODE OR BY THE COURT.                        363          

      (D)  THE ISSUANCE OF A PARKING TICKET, THE FILING OF OR      365          

FAILURE TO FILE AN ANSWER BY A PERSON PERSONALLY OR                366          

CONSTRUCTIVELY SERVED WITH THE TICKET, THE SUBSTANCE OF AN         367          

ANSWER, THE PAYMENT OF ANY FINE, AND ANY OTHER RELEVANT            368          

                                                          10     

                                                                 
INFORMATION SHALL BE ENTERED IN THE RECORDS OF THE PARTICULAR      369          

BUREAU.                                                            370          

      Sec. 765.07.  (A)  WHEN A PERSON IS PERSONALLY OR            372          

CONSTRUCTIVELY SERVED WITH A TICKET CHARGING THE COMMISSION OF A   374          

LAND USE INFRACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 765.03 OF THE       375          

REVISED CODE AND THE PERSON FAILS TO ANSWER THE CHARGE WITHIN THE  377          

TIME SPECIFIED BY THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UNDER SECTION 765.02   378          

OF THE REVISED CODE, THE LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINT LAND  380          

USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU THAT HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE INFRACTION    382          

SHALL SEND A NOTIFICATION OF INFRACTION TO THAT PERSON.                         

      (B)  A NOTIFICATION OF INFRACTION SHALL BE SENT WITHIN       384          

TWELVE MONTHS AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF THE TIME SPECIFIED BY THE    385          

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UNDER SECTION 765.02 OF THE REVISED CODE     387          

FOR THE MAKING OF AN ANSWER, SHALL BE SENT BY FIRST CLASS MAIL,    388          

AND SHALL CONTAIN ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:                            389          

      (1)  AN IDENTIFICATION OF THE LAND USE INFRACTION WITH       391          

WHICH THE PERSON WAS CHARGED AND THE TIME AND DATE OF THE          392          

INFRACTION, WHICH IDENTIFICATION MAY BE A COPY OF THE TICKET       394          

CHARGING THE INFRACTION THAT WAS PERSONALLY OR CONSTRUCTIVELY      395          

SERVED UPON THE PERSON;                                                         

      (2)  AN IDENTIFICATION OF THE AMOUNT OF THE FINE,            397          

PENALTIES, AND COSTS ARISING OUT OF THE INFRACTION THAT ARE DUE;   399          

      (3)  A WARNING THAT THE PERSON MUST ANSWER THE INFRACTION    402          

CHARGED IN THE TICKET WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OR A DEFAULT CIVIL        403          

JUDGMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF THE FINE, PENALTIES, AND COSTS DUE MAY   404          

BE ENTERED AGAINST THE PERSON;                                                  

      (4)  A DESCRIPTION OF THE ALLOWABLE ANSWERS THAT MAY BE      406          

MADE AND NOTIFICATION THAT THE PERSON WILL BE AFFORDED A HEARING   407          

BEFORE THE BUREAU IF THE PERSON DENIES IN THE ANSWER THAT THE      409          

PERSON COMMITTED THE INFRACTION;                                   410          

      (5)  AN IDENTIFICATION OF THE MANNERS IN WHICH AND THE       412          

ENTITY TO WHICH AN ANSWER MAY BE MADE;                             413          

      (6)  A WARNING THAT IF THE PERSON FAILS TO APPEAR AT A       415          

REQUESTED HEARING, A DEFAULT CIVIL JUDGMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF THE   416          

                                                          11     

                                                                 
FINE, PENALTIES, AND COSTS DUE MAY BE ENTERED AGAINST THE PERSON.  417          

      (C)  A PERSON WHO RECEIVES A NOTIFICATION OF INFRACTION      419          

UNDER THIS SECTION MAY ANSWER THE LAND USE INFRACTION WITH WHICH   421          

THE PERSON IS CHARGED THAT IS IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTIFICATION OF    422          

INFRACTION IN ANY OF THE MANNERS PROVIDED IN DIVISION (A) OF       423          

SECTION 765.06 OF THE REVISED CODE FOR ANSWERS TO LAND USE         424          

INFRACTIONS CHARGED IN A TICKET.  AN ANSWER UNDER THIS SECTION     426          

SHALL BE MADE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER THE DATE ON WHICH THE       427          

NOTIFICATION OF INFRACTION WAS MAILED, AND SHALL BE IN ONE OF THE  428          

FORMS SPECIFIED IN DIVISIONS (A)(1), (2), AND (3) OF SECTION                    

765.06 OF THE REVISED CODE FOR ANSWERS TO LAND USE INFRACTIONS     430          

CHARGED IN A TICKET, EXCEPT THAT IF THE ANSWER INCLUDES PAYMENT    432          

OF THE FINE ARISING OUT OF THE INFRACTION, ANY PENALTY ARISING     433          

OUT OF THE INFRACTION ALSO SHALL BE PAID.  THE ANSWER SHALL BE     434          

GOVERNED BY DIVISION (B) OF SECTION 765.06 OF THE REVISED CODE     435          

FOR ANSWERS RELATIVE TO LAND USE INFRACTIONS CHARGED IN A TICKET,  436          

EXCEPT THAT ANY DETERMINATION OF THE AMOUNT TO BE PAID UNDER AN    437          

ANSWER ADMITTING THE COMMISSION OF THE INFRACTION WITH             438          

EXPLANATION ALSO SHALL CONSIDER ANY PENALTY ARISING OUT OF THE     439          

INFRACTION.                                                                     

      (D)  IF A PERSON WHO IS ISSUED A NOTIFICATION OF INFRACTION  441          

FAILS TO TIMELY ANSWER, AS PROVIDED IN DIVISION (C) OF THIS        442          

SECTION, THE FAILURE TO ANSWER SHALL BE CONSIDERED AN ADMISSION    443          

THAT THE PERSON COMMITTED THE LAND USE INFRACTION, AND A DEFAULT   444          

CIVIL JUDGMENT, IN THE AMOUNT OF THE FINE, PENALTIES, AND COSTS    445          

DUE, MAY BE ENTERED AGAINST THE PERSON.  FAILURE TO TIMELY ANSWER  446          

THE INFRACTION IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTIFICATION OF INFRACTION MAY    448          

RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF THE ADDITIONAL PENALTIES PRESCRIBED    449          

BY CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION OF THE MUNICIPAL     450          

CORPORATION ENACTED UNDER SECTION 765.02 OF THE REVISED CODE OR    451          

BY THE COURT.                                                                   

      (E)  THE SENDING OF A NOTIFICATION OF INFRACTION, THE        453          

FILING OF OR FAILURE TO FILE AN ANSWER BY THE PERSON TO WHOM IT    454          

IS SENT, THE SUBSTANCE OF AN ANSWER, THE PAYMENT OF ANY FINE, AND  455          

                                                          12     

                                                                 
ANY OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION SHALL BE ENTERED IN THE RECORDS OF  456          

THE PARTICULAR BUREAU.                                             457          

      Sec. 765.08.  (A)  IF A PERSON WHO IS PERSONALLY OR          459          

CONSTRUCTIVELY SERVED WITH A TICKET CHARGING THE COMMISSION OF A   461          

LAND USE INFRACTION OR WHO RECEIVES A NOTIFICATION OF INFRACTION   462          

DENIES, IN THE PERSON'S ANSWER TO THE CHARGE, HAVING COMMITTED                  

THE INFRACTION, THE LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINT LAND USE   465          

VIOLATIONS BUREAU THAT HAS JURISDICTION SHALL CONDUCT A HEARING                 

TO DETERMINE IF THE PERSON COMMITTED THE INFRACTION.  EACH         466          

HEARING SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY A HEARING EXAMINER OF THE LAND USE   467          

VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU.  EACH       468          

HEARING SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN THE MANNER THE HEARING EXAMINER      470          

CONSIDERS APPROPRIATE.  RULES REGARDING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF       471          

EVIDENCE SHALL NOT BE STRICTLY APPLIED IN THE HEARING, BUT ALL     472          

TESTIMONY SHALL BE UNDER OATH.                                     473          

      AT THE HEARING, THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION WHOSE CODE,        475          

ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION ALLEGEDLY WAS VIOLATED AND    476          

RESULTED IN THE CHARGE HAS THE BURDEN OF PROVING, BY A             477          

PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE, THAT THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE        478          

HEARING IS BEING CONDUCTED COMMITTED THE LAND USE INFRACTION.  IF  479          

THE PERSON, IN THE PERSON'S ANSWER, DENIED HAVING COMMITTED THE    480          

INFRACTION AND REQUESTED THE PRESENCE AT THE HEARING OF THE LAW    482          

ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHO ISSUED THE TICKET, THE OFFICER SHALL BE    483          

REQUIRED TO ATTEND THE HEARING UNLESS THE HEARING EXAMINER         484          

DETERMINES THAT THE OFFICER'S PRESENCE IS NOT REQUIRED.  IF THE    485          

OFFICER'S PRESENCE AT THE HEARING HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND THE       486          

OFFICER IS UNABLE TO ATTEND THE HEARING ON THE DAY AND AT THE      487          

TIME SCHEDULED, THE HEARING EXAMINER MAY GRANT A REASONABLE        488          

CONTINUANCE.  THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE HEARING IS BEING CONDUCTED   489          

MAY PRESENT ANY RELEVANT EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY AT THE HEARING.    490          

THE PERSON DOES NOT HAVE TO ATTEND THE HEARING IF THE PERSON       491          

SUBMITS DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PRIOR TO THE  493          

DAY OF THE HEARING.                                                             

      THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHALL SUBMIT THE ORIGINAL TICKET   496          

                                                          13     

                                                                 
THAT WAS PERSONALLY OR CONSTRUCTIVELY SERVED ON THE PERSON OR A    497          

TRUE COPY OF THAT TICKET.  THE TICKET IN PROPER FORM IS            498          

PRIMA-FACIE EVIDENCE THAT THE PERSON TO WHOM THE TICKET WAS        499          

SERVED WAS THE PERSON WHO COMMITTED THE LAND USE INFRACTION.  THE  500          

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MAY PRESENT ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE AND          501          

TESTIMONY AT THE HEARING.  THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DOES NOT      502          

HAVE TO BE REPRESENTED AT THE HEARING BY AN ATTORNEY.              503          

      (B)(1)  IF A PERSON FOR WHOM A HEARING IS TO BE CONDUCTED    505          

UNDER DIVISION (A) OF THIS SECTION APPEARS AT THE SCHEDULED        506          

HEARING OR SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THAT DIVISION, THE  507          

HEARING EXAMINER SHALL CONSIDER ALL EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY         509          

PRESENTED AND SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION    510          

HAS ESTABLISHED, BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE, THAT THE      511          

PERSON COMMITTED THE LAND USE INFRACTION.  IF THE HEARING                       

EXAMINER DETERMINES THAT THE PERSON COMMITTED THE INFRACTION, AN   513          

ORDER INDICATING THE DETERMINATION AS A JUDGMENT AGAINST THE       514          

PERSON AND REQUIRING THE PERSON TO PAY THE APPROPRIATE FINE AND    515          

ANY ADDITIONAL PENALTIES SHALL BE ENTERED IN THE RECORDS OF THE    516          

LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU,    517          

WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE.                                                        

      (2)  IF A PERSON FOR WHOM A HEARING IS TO BE CONDUCTED       519          

UNDER DIVISION (A) OF THIS SECTION FAILS TO APPEAR AT THE          520          

SCHEDULED HEARING AND FAILS TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH  521          

THAT DIVISION, THE HEARING EXAMINER, AFTER DETERMINING FROM ANY    522          

EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED AT THE HEARING, BY A              525          

PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE, THAT THE PERSON COMMITTED THE LAND  526          

USE INFRACTION, SHALL ENTER A DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST THE PERSON  527          

AND REQUIRE THE PERSON TO PAY THE APPROPRIATE FINE AND ANY         528          

ADDITIONAL PENALTIES.  A DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED UNDER THIS       529          

DIVISION SHALL BE ENTERED IN THE RECORDS OF THE LAND USE           530          

VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU, WHICHEVER   531          

IS APPLICABLE.                                                     532          

      (3)  IF A PERSON WHO IS SENT A NOTIFICATION OF INFRACTION    534          

UNDER SECTION 765.07 OF THE REVISED CODE DOES NOT TIMELY ANSWER,   536          

                                                          14     

                                                                 
AS PROVIDED IN DIVISION (C) OF THAT SECTION, THE HEARING EXAMINER  537          

OF THE LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS     538          

BUREAU, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, AFTER DETERMINING FROM ANY        539          

EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY PRESENTED BY THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BY  541          

A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE, THAT THE PERSON COMMITTED THE                  

LAND USE INFRACTION, SHALL ENTER A DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST THE    542          

PERSON AND REQUIRE THE PERSON TO PAY THE APPROPRIATE FINE AND ANY  543          

ADDITIONAL PENALTIES.  A DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED UNDER THIS       544          

DIVISION SHALL BE ENTERED IN THE RECORDS OF THE LAND USE           545          

VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU, WHICHEVER   546          

IS APPLICABLE.                                                     547          

      (4)  IF THE HEARING EXAMINER DOES NOT DETERMINE, BY A        550          

PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE, THAT A PERSON IN ANY OF THE                      

CLASSES DESCRIBED IN DIVISION (B)(1), (2), OR (3) OF THIS SECTION  551          

COMMITTED THE LAND USE INFRACTION, THE HEARING EXAMINER SHALL      553          

ENTER JUDGMENT AGAINST THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION WHOSE CODE,                    

ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION ALLEGEDLY WAS VIOLATED,       554          

SHALL DISMISS THE CHARGE OF THE INFRACTION AGAINST THE PERSON,     555          

AND SHALL ENTER THE JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL IN THE RECORDS OF THE   556          

LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU,    557          

WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE.                                           559          

      (5)  A DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED UNDER THIS SECTION MAY BE    561          

VACATED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER WHO ENTERED IT IF ALL OF THE       563          

FOLLOWING APPLY:                                                                

      (a)  THE PERSON AGAINST WHOM THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT WAS        565          

ENTERED FILES A MOTION WITH THE PROPER LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU  566          

OR JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU WITHIN ONE YEAR AFTER THE      567          

DATE OF ENTRY OF THE JUDGMENT.                                     568          

      (b)  THE MOTION SETS FORTH A SUFFICIENT DEFENSE TO THE LAND  571          

USE INFRACTION OUT OF WHICH THE JUDGMENT AROSE.                                 

      (c)  THE MOTION SETS FORTH EXCUSABLE NEGLECT AS TO THE       573          

PERSON'S FAILURE TO ATTEND THE HEARING OR ANSWER THE NOTIFICATION  574          

OF INFRACTION.                                                     575          

      (C)  PAYMENT OF ANY JUDGMENT OR DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED     577          

                                                          15     

                                                                 
AGAINST A PERSON UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE MADE TO THE           578          

VIOLATIONS CLERK OF THE LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINT LAND   579          

USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU IN WHICH THE JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED, WITHIN    580          

TEN DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF ENTRY.  ALL MONEY PAID IN SATISFACTION  581          

OF A JUDGMENT OR DEFAULT JUDGMENT SHALL BE DISBURSED BY THE CLERK  582          

TO THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION WHOSE CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION,    583          

OR REGULATION WAS VIOLATED, AND THE CLERK SHALL ENTER THE FACT OF  584          

PAYMENT OF THE MONEY AND ITS DISBURSEMENT IN THE RECORDS OF THE    585          

BUREAU.  IF PAYMENT IS NOT MADE WITHIN THIS TIME PERIOD, THE       587          

JUDGMENT OR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE    588          

MUNICIPAL COURT OR COUNTY COURT WITHIN WHOSE TERRITORIAL                        

JURISDICTION THE CODE, ORDINANCE, RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION WAS    589          

VIOLATED, AND WHEN SO FILED, HAS THE SAME FORCE AND EFFECT AS A    591          

MONEY JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION RENDERED IN THAT COURT.                        

      JUDGMENTS AND DEFAULT JUDGMENTS FILED WITH A COURT UNDER     594          

THIS DIVISION SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN AN INDEX AND JUDGMENT ROLL    595          

SEPARATE FROM OTHER JUDGMENTS RENDERED IN THE COURT.  COMPUTER     596          

PRINTOUTS, MICROFILM, MICRODOT, MICROFICHE, OR OTHER SIMILAR DATA  597          

RECORDING TECHNIQUES MAY BE UTILIZED TO RECORD SUCH JUDGMENTS.     598          

WHEN A JUDGMENT OR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS FILED WITH A COURT,         599          

EXECUTION MAY BE LEVIED, AND SUCH OTHER MEASURES MAY BE TAKEN FOR  600          

ITS COLLECTION AS ARE AUTHORIZED FOR THE COLLECTION OF AN UNPAID   601          

MONEY JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION RENDERED IN THAT COURT.  THE      602          

MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY COURT MAY ASSESS COSTS AGAINST THE JUDGMENT    603          

DEBTOR, IN AN AMOUNT NOT EXCEEDING TEN DOLLARS FOR EACH LAND USE   604          

INFRACTION, TO BE PAID UPON SATISFACTION OF THE JUDGMENT.          605          

      (D)  ANY PERSON AGAINST WHOM A JUDGMENT OR DEFAULT JUDGMENT  607          

IS ENTERED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AND ANY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION  608          

AGAINST WHICH A JUDGMENT IS ENTERED UNDER THIS SECTION MAY APPEAL  610          

THE JUDGMENT OR DEFAULT JUDGMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL COURT OR COUNTY  611          

COURT WITHIN WHOSE TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION THE CODE, ORDINANCE,                

RESOLUTION, OR REGULATION WAS VIOLATED BY FILING NOTICES OF        613          

APPEAL WITH THE LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINT LAND USE       614          

VIOLATIONS BUREAU IN WHICH THE JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED, AND WITH THE  616          

                                                          16     

                                                                 
MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY COURT WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF    617          

ENTRY OF THE JUDGMENT AND BY THE PAYMENT OF SUCH REASONABLE COSTS  618          

AS THE COURT REQUIRES.  UPON THE FILING OF AN APPEAL, THE COURT    619          

SHALL SCHEDULE A HEARING DATE AND NOTIFY THE PARTIES OF THE DATE,  621          

TIME, AND PLACE OF THE HEARING.  THE HEARING SHALL BE HELD BY THE  622          

COURT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF THE COURT.  SERVICE OF A     623          

NOTICE OF APPEAL UNDER THIS DIVISION BY A PERSON DOES NOT STAY     624          

ENFORCEMENT AND COLLECTION OF THE JUDGMENT OR DEFAULT JUDGMENT     625          

FROM WHICH APPEAL IS TAKEN BY THE PERSON UNLESS THE PERSON WHO     626          

FILES THE APPEAL POSTS BOND WITH THE LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU    627          

OR JOINT LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU IN THE AMOUNT OF THE           629          

JUDGMENT, PLUS COURT COSTS, AT OR BEFORE SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF  630          

APPEAL.                                                                         

      NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, THE JUDGMENT ON  632          

APPEAL OF THE MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY COURT IS FINAL, AND NO OTHER     634          

APPEAL OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU OR JOINT  635          

LAND USE VIOLATIONS BUREAU, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, AND NO        636          

APPEAL OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY COURT MAY BE     637          

TAKEN.                                                                          

      (E)  A JUDGMENT OR DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED UNDER THIS       640          

SECTION MAY BE FILED WITH A MUNICIPAL COURT OR COUNTY COURT UNDER  641          

DIVISION (C) OF THIS SECTION AT ANY TIME WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER  642          

THE DATE OF ISSUANCE OF THE TICKET CHARGING THE LAND USE           643          

INFRACTION OUT OF WHICH THE JUDGMENT AROSE.  THIS DIVISION         644          

APPLIES TO ANY TICKET ISSUED FOR AN OFFENSE THAT WOULD BE A LAND   645          

USE INFRACTION ON OR AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION, IF  646          

THE TICKET WAS ISSUED WITHIN THREE YEARS PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE    647          

DATE OF THIS SECTION AND A WARRANT HAS NOT BEEN ISSUED AND SERVED  648          

ON THE PERSON INVOLVED IN THE OFFENSE.                             649          

      Section 2.  Chapter 765. of the Revised Code shall be known  651          

as "Noncriminal Land Use Infractions."                             652