|
|
To enact sections 2307.84 to 2307.90 and section | 1 |
2307.901 of the Revised Code to establish minimum | 2 |
medical requirements for filing certain silica | 3 |
claims or mixed dust disease claims, to establish | 4 |
premises liability in relation to those claims, | 5 |
and to prescribe the requirements for shareholder | 6 |
liability for those claims under the doctrine of | 7 |
piercing the corporate veil. | 8 |
Section 1. That sections 2307.84, 2307.85, 2307.86, 2307.87, | 9 |
2307.88, 2307.89, 2307.90, and 2307.901 of the Revised Code be | 10 |
enacted to read as follows: | 11 |
Sec. 2307.84. As used in sections 2307.84 to 2307.90 of the | 12 |
Revised Code: | 13 |
(A) "AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment" | 14 |
means the American medical association's guides to the evaluation | 15 |
of permanent impairment (fifth edition 2000) as may be modified by | 16 |
the American medical association. | 17 |
(B) "Board-certified internist" means a medical doctor who is | 18 |
currently certified by the American board of internal medicine. | 19 |
(C) "Board-certified occupational medicine specialist" means | 20 |
a medical doctor who is currently certified by the American board | 21 |
of internal medicine or the American board of preventive medicine | 22 |
in the specialty of occupational medicine. | 23 |
(D) "Board-certified oncologist" means a medical doctor who | 24 |
is currently certified by the American board of internal medicine | 25 |
in the subspecialty of medical oncology. | 26 |
(E) "Board-certified pathologist" means a medical doctor who | 27 |
is currently certified by the American board of pathology. | 28 |
(F) "Board-certified pulmonary specialist" means a medical | 29 |
doctor who is currently certified by the American board of | 30 |
internal medicine in the subspecialty of pulmonary medicine. | 31 |
(G) "Certified B-reader" means an individual qualified as a | 32 |
"final" or "B-reader" as defined in 42 C.F.R. section 37.51(b), as | 33 |
amended. | 34 |
(H) "Exposed person" means either of the following, whichever | 35 |
is applicable: | 36 |
(1) A person whose exposure to silica is the basis for a | 37 |
silica claim under section 2307.85 of the Revised Code; | 38 |
(2) A person whose exposure to mixed dust is the basis for a | 39 |
mixed dust disease claim under section 2307.86 of the Revised | 40 |
Code. | 41 |
(I) "Forced vital capacity" means forced vital capacity that | 42 |
is maximal volume of air expired with maximum effort from a | 43 |
position of full inspiration. | 44 |
(J) "ILO scale" means the system for the classification of | 45 |
chest x-rays set forth in the international labour office's | 46 |
guidelines for the use of ILO international classification of | 47 |
radiographs of pneumoconioses (1980), as amended. | 48 |
(K) "Lung cancer" means a malignant tumor in which the | 49 |
primary site of origin of the cancer is inside the lungs. | 50 |
(L) "Mixed dust" means a mixture of dusts composed of silica | 51 |
or asbestos or one or more other dusts. | 52 |
(M) "Mixed dust disease claim" means any claim for damages, | 53 |
losses, indemnification, contribution, or other relief arising out | 54 |
of, based on, or in any way related to mixed dust pneumoconiosis. | 55 |
"Mixed dust disease claim" includes a claim made by or on behalf | 56 |
of any person who has been exposed to mixed dust, or any | 57 |
representative, spouse, parent, child, or other relative of that | 58 |
person, for injury, including mental or emotional injury, death, | 59 |
or loss to person, risk of disease or other injury, costs of | 60 |
medical monitoring or surveillance, or any other effects on the | 61 |
person's health that are caused by the person's exposure to mixed | 62 |
dust. | 63 |
(N) "Mixed dust pneumoconiosis" means the interstitial lung | 64 |
disease caused by the pulmonary response to inhaled mixed dusts. | 65 |
(O) "Nonmalignant condition" means a condition, other than a | 66 |
diagnosed cancer, that is caused or may be caused by either of the | 67 |
following, whichever is applicable: | 68 |
(1) Silica, as provided in section 2307.85 of the Revised | 69 |
Code; | 70 |
(2) Mixed dust, as provided in section 2307.86 of the Revised | 71 |
Code. | 72 |
(P) "Pathological evidence of mixed dust pneumoconiosis" | 73 |
means a statement by a board-certified pathologist that more than | 74 |
one representative section of lung tissue uninvolved with any | 75 |
other disease process demonstrates a pattern of peribronchiolar | 76 |
and parenchymal stellate (star-shaped) nodular scarring and that | 77 |
there is no other more likely explanation for the presence of the | 78 |
fibrosis. | 79 |
(Q) "Pathological evidence of silicosis" means a statement by | 80 |
a board-certified pathologist that more than one representative | 81 |
section of lung tissue uninvolved with any other disease process | 82 |
demonstrates a pattern of round silica nodules (well-organized | 83 |
concentric whorls of collagen surrounded by inflammatory cells) in | 84 |
the lung parenchyma and that there is no other more likely | 85 |
explanation for the presence of the fibrosis. | 86 |
(R) "Physical impairment" means any of the following, | 87 |
whichever is applicable: | 88 |
(1) A nonmalignant condition that meets the minimum | 89 |
requirements of division (B) of section 2307.85 of the Revised | 90 |
Code or lung cancer of an exposed person who is a smoker that | 91 |
meets the minimum requirements of division (C) of section 2307.85 | 92 |
of the Revised Code; | 93 |
(2) A nonmalignant condition that meets the minimum | 94 |
requirements of division (B) of section 2307.86 of the Revised | 95 |
Code or lung cancer of an exposed person who is a smoker that | 96 |
meets the minimum requirements of division (C) of section 2307.86 | 97 |
of the Revised Code. | 98 |
(S) "Plethysmography" means a test for determining lung | 99 |
volume, also known as "body plethysmography," in which the subject | 100 |
of the test is enclosed in a chamber that is equipped to measure | 101 |
pressure, flow, or volume changes. | 102 |
(T) "Predicted lower limit of normal" means the fifth | 103 |
percentile of healthy populations based on age, height, and | 104 |
gender, as referenced in the AMA guides to the evaluation of | 105 |
permanent impairment. | 106 |
(U) "Premises owner" means a person who owns, in whole or in | 107 |
part, leases, rents, maintains, or controls privately owned lands, | 108 |
ways, or waters, or any buildings and structures on those lands, | 109 |
ways, or waters, and all privately owned and state-owned lands, | 110 |
ways, or waters leased to a private person, firm, or organization, | 111 |
including any buildings and structures on those lands, ways, or | 112 |
waters. | 113 |
(V) "Qualified physician" means a medical doctor who is | 114 |
providing a diagnosis for purposes of constituting prima-facie | 115 |
evidence of an exposed person's physical impairment that meets the | 116 |
requirements specified in section 2307.85 or 2307.86 of the | 117 |
Revised Code, whichever is applicable, and who meets the following | 118 |
requirements: | 119 |
(1) The medical doctor is a board-certified internist, | 120 |
pulmonary specialist, oncologist, pathologist, or occupational | 121 |
medicine specialist. | 122 |
(2) The medical doctor is actually treating or has treated | 123 |
the exposed person and has or had a doctor-patient relationship | 124 |
with the person. | 125 |
(3) The medical doctor spends not more than twenty-five per | 126 |
cent of the medical doctor's professional practice time in | 127 |
providing consulting or expert services in connection with actual | 128 |
or potential tort actions, and the medical doctor's medical group, | 129 |
professional corporation, clinic, or other affiliated group earns | 130 |
not more than twenty per cent of its revenues from providing those | 131 |
services. | 132 |
(W) "Radiological evidence of mixed dust pneumoconiosis" | 133 |
means a chest x-ray showing irregular opacities in the upper lung | 134 |
fields graded by a certified B-reader as at least 1/1 on the ILO | 135 |
scale. | 136 |
(X) "Radiological evidence of silicosis" means a chest x-ray | 137 |
showing small rounded opacities in the upper lung fields graded by | 138 |
a certified B-reader as at least 1/1 on the ILO scale. | 139 |
(Y) "Regular basis" means on a frequent or recurring basis. | 140 |
(Z) "Silica" means a group of naturally occurring crystalline | 141 |
forms of silicon dioxide, including, but not limited to, quartz | 142 |
and sand. | 143 |
(AA) "Silica claim" means any claim for damages, losses, | 144 |
indemnification, contribution, or other relief arising out of, | 145 |
based on, or in any way related to silica. "Silica claim" includes | 146 |
a claim made by or on behalf of any person who has been exposed to | 147 |
silica, or any representative, spouse, parent, child, or other | 148 |
relative of that person, for injury, including mental or emotional | 149 |
injury, death, or loss to person, risk of disease or other injury, | 150 |
costs of medical monitoring or surveillance, or any other effects | 151 |
on the person's health that are caused by the person's exposure to | 152 |
silica. | 153 |
(BB) "Silicosis" means an interstitial lung disease caused by | 154 |
the pulmonary response to inhaled silica. | 155 |
(CC) "Smoker" means a person who has smoked the equivalent of | 156 |
one-pack year, as specified in the written report of a qualified | 157 |
physician pursuant to section 2307.85 or 2307.86 and section | 158 |
2307.87 of the Revised Code, during the last fifteen years. | 159 |
(DD) "Spirometry" means the measurement of volume of air | 160 |
inhaled or exhaled by the lung. | 161 |
(EE) "Substantial contributing factor" means both of the | 162 |
following: | 163 |
(1) Exposure to silica or mixed dust is the predominate cause | 164 |
of the physical impairment alleged in the silica claim or mixed | 165 |
dust disease claim, whichever is applicable. | 166 |
(2) A qualified physician has determined with a reasonable | 167 |
degree of medical certainty that the physical impairment of the | 168 |
exposed person would not have occurred but for the silica or mixed | 169 |
dust exposures. | 170 |
(FF) "Substantial occupational exposure to silica" means | 171 |
employment for a cumulative period of at least five years in an | 172 |
industry and an occupation in which, for a substantial portion of | 173 |
a normal work year for that occupation, the exposed person did any | 174 |
of the following: | 175 |
(1) Handled silica; | 176 |
(2) Fabricated silica-containing products so that the person | 177 |
was exposed to silica in the fabrication process; | 178 |
(3) Altered, repaired, or otherwise worked with a | 179 |
silica-containing product in a manner that exposed the person on a | 180 |
regular basis to silica; | 181 |
(4) Worked in close proximity to other workers engaged in any | 182 |
of the activities described in division (FF)(1), (2), or (3) of | 183 |
this section in a manner that exposed the person on a regular | 184 |
basis to silica. | 185 |
(GG) "Substantial occupational exposure to mixed dust" means | 186 |
employment for a cumulative period of at least five years in an | 187 |
industry and an occupation in which, for a substantial portion of | 188 |
a normal work year for that occupation, the exposed person did any | 189 |
of the following: | 190 |
(1) Handled mixed dust; | 191 |
(2) Fabricated mixed dust-containing products so that the | 192 |
person was exposed to mixed dust in the fabrication process; | 193 |
(3) Altered, repaired, or otherwise worked with a mixed | 194 |
dust-containing product in a manner that exposed the person on a | 195 |
regular basis to mixed dust; | 196 |
(4) Worked in close proximity to other workers engaged in any | 197 |
of the activities described in division (GG)(1), (2), or (3) of | 198 |
this section in a manner that exposed the person on a regular | 199 |
basis to mixed dust. | 200 |
(HH) "Timed gas dilution" means a method for measuring total | 201 |
lung capacity in which the subject breathes into a spirometer | 202 |
containing a known concentration of an inert and insoluble gas for | 203 |
a specific time, and the concentration of the inert and insoluble | 204 |
gas in the lung is then compared to the concentration of that type | 205 |
of gas in the spirometer. | 206 |
(II) "Tort action" means a civil action for damages for | 207 |
injury, death, or loss to person. "Tort action" includes a product | 208 |
liability claim that is subject to sections 2307.71 to 2307.80 of | 209 |
the Revised Code or a silica claim or mixed dust claim that is | 210 |
subject to sections 2307.84 to 2307.88 of the Revised Code. "Tort | 211 |
action" does not include any of the following: | 212 |
(1) A civil action for damages for a breach of contract or | 213 |
another agreement between persons; | 214 |
(2) A civil action relating to any workers' compensation law; | 215 |
(3) A civil action alleging any claim or demand made against | 216 |
a trust established pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 524(g); | 217 |
(4) A civil action alleging any claim or demand made against | 218 |
a trust established pursuant to a plan of reorganization confirmed | 219 |
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. | 220 |
(JJ) "Total lung capacity" means the volume of air contained | 221 |
in the lungs at the end of a maximal inspiration. | 222 |
(KK) "Veterans' benefit program" means any program for | 223 |
benefits in connection with military service administered by the | 224 |
veterans' administration under title 38 of the United States Code. | 225 |
(LL) "Workers' compensation law" means Chapters 4121., 4123., | 226 |
4127., and 4131. of the Revised Code. | 227 |
Sec. 2307.85. (A) Physical impairment of the exposed person, | 228 |
to which the person's exposure to silica is a substantial | 229 |
contributing factor, shall be an essential element of a silica | 230 |
claim in any tort action. | 231 |
(B) No person shall bring or maintain a tort action alleging | 232 |
a silica claim based on a nonmalignant condition in the absence of | 233 |
a prima-facie showing, in the manner described in division (A) of | 234 |
section 2307.87 of the Revised Code, that the exposed person has a | 235 |
physical impairment, that the physical impairment is a result of a | 236 |
medical condition, and that the person's exposure to silica is a | 237 |
substantial contributing factor to the medical condition. That | 238 |
prima-facie showing shall include all of the following minimum | 239 |
requirements: | 240 |
(1) Evidence verifying that a qualified physician has taken a | 241 |
detailed occupational and exposure history of the exposed person | 242 |
from the exposed person or, if that person is deceased, from the | 243 |
person who is most knowledgeable about the exposures that form the | 244 |
basis of the silica claim for a nonmalignant condition, including | 245 |
all of the following: | 246 |
(a) All of the exposed person's principal places of | 247 |
employment and exposures to airborne contaminants; | 248 |
(b) Whether each place of employment involved exposures to | 249 |
airborne contaminants, including, but not limited to, silica or | 250 |
other disease causing dusts, that can cause pulmonary impairment | 251 |
and, if that type of exposure is involved, the nature, duration, | 252 |
and level of exposure. | 253 |
(2) Evidence verifying that a qualified physician has taken a | 254 |
detailed medical and smoking history of the exposed person, | 255 |
including a thorough review of the exposed person's past and | 256 |
present medical problems and the most probable causes of those | 257 |
medical problems; | 258 |
(3) A diagnosis by a qualified physician, based on a medical | 259 |
examination and pulmonary function testing of the exposed person, | 260 |
that all of the following apply to the exposed person: | 261 |
(a) The exposed person has a permanent respiratory impairment | 262 |
rating of at least class 2 as defined by and evaluated pursuant to | 263 |
the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. | 264 |
(b) The exposed person has silicosis based at a minimum on | 265 |
radiological or pathological evidence of silicosis. In the case of | 266 |
death of an exposed person, if no pulmonary function testing | 267 |
results are available, the pathological or radiological evidence | 268 |
of silicosis and evidence from a qualified physician who treated | 269 |
the exposed person showing that the silicosis was a substantial | 270 |
contributing factor of the exposed person's physical impairment | 271 |
prior to death or a substantial contributing factor of the exposed | 272 |
person's death are sufficient to satisfy the minimum requirements | 273 |
for a prima-facie showing under division (B) of this section. | 274 |
(c) The silicosis described in division (B)(3)(b) of this | 275 |
section is a substantial contributing factor to the exposed | 276 |
person's physical impairment or death, based at a minimum on a | 277 |
determination that the exposed person has any of the following: | 278 |
(i) A forced vital capacity below the predicted lower limit | 279 |
of normal; | 280 |
(ii) A total lung capacity, by plethysmography or timed gas | 281 |
dilution, below the predicted lower limit of normal; | 282 |
(iii) A chest x-ray showing small, rounded opacities in the | 283 |
upper lung fields graded by a certified B-reader at least 1/1 on | 284 |
the ILO scale. | 285 |
(C)(1) No person shall bring or maintain a tort action | 286 |
alleging a silica claim based upon lung cancer of an exposed | 287 |
person who is a smoker, in the absence of a prima-facie showing, | 288 |
in the manner described in division (A) of section 2307.87 of the | 289 |
Revised Code, of all of the following minimum requirements: | 290 |
(a) A diagnosis by a board-certified pathologist, | 291 |
board-certified pulmonary specialist, or board-certified | 292 |
oncologist that the exposed person has primary lung cancer and | 293 |
that exposure to silica is a substantial contributing factor to | 294 |
that cancer; | 295 |
(b) Evidence that is sufficient to demonstrate that at least | 296 |
ten years have elapsed from the date of the exposed person's first | 297 |
exposure to silica until the date of diagnosis of the exposed | 298 |
person's primary lung cancer. The ten-year latency period | 299 |
described in this division is a rebuttable presumption and the | 300 |
plaintiff has the burden of proof to rebut the presumption. | 301 |
(c) Both of the following: | 302 |
(i) Radiological or pathological evidence of silicosis; | 303 |
(ii) Evidence of the exposed person's substantial | 304 |
occupational exposure to silica. | 305 |
(2) If a plaintiff files a tort action that alleges a silica | 306 |
claim based upon lung cancer of an exposed person who is a smoker | 307 |
and further alleges in the action that the plaintiff's exposure to | 308 |
silica was the result of living with another person who, if the | 309 |
tort action had been filed by the other person, would have met the | 310 |
requirements specified in division (C)(1)(c) of this section and | 311 |
that the plaintiff lived with the other person for the period of | 312 |
time specified in division (FF) of section 2307.84 of the Revised | 313 |
Code, the plaintiff is considered as having satisfied the | 314 |
requirements specified in division (C)(1)(c) of this section. | 315 |
(D) Evidence relating to physical impairment under this | 316 |
section, including pulmonary function testing and diffusing | 317 |
studies, shall comply with the technical recommendations for | 318 |
examinations, testing procedures, quality assurance, quality | 319 |
control, and equipment incorporated in the AMA guides to the | 320 |
evaluation of permanent impairment and reported as set forth in 20 | 321 |
C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. P, App. 1, Part A, Sec. 3.00 E. and F., and | 322 |
the interpretive standards set forth in the official statement of | 323 |
the American thoracic society entitled "lung function testing: | 324 |
selection of reference values and interpretive strategies" as | 325 |
published in American review of respiratory disease, | 326 |
1991:144:1202-1218. | 327 |
(E) All of the following apply to the presentation of | 328 |
prima-facie evidence that meets the requirements of division (B) | 329 |
or (C) of this section: | 330 |
(1) It does not result in any presumption at trial that the | 331 |
exposed person has a physical impairment that is caused by a | 332 |
silica-related condition. | 333 |
(2) It is not conclusive as to the liability of any defendant | 334 |
in the case. | 335 |
(3) It is not admissible at trial. | 336 |
Sec. 2307.86. (A) Physical impairment of the exposed person, | 337 |
to which the person's exposure to mixed dust is a substantial | 338 |
contributing factor, shall be an essential element of a mixed dust | 339 |
disease claim in any tort action. | 340 |
(B) No person shall bring or maintain a tort action alleging | 341 |
a mixed dust disease claim based on a nonmalignant condition in | 342 |
the absence of a prima-facie showing, in the manner described in | 343 |
division (A) of section 2307.87 of the Revised Code, that the | 344 |
exposed person has a physical impairment, that the physical | 345 |
impairment is a result of a medical condition, and that the | 346 |
person's exposure to mixed dust is a substantial contributing | 347 |
factor to the medical condition. That prima-facie showing shall | 348 |
include all of the following minimum requirements: | 349 |
(1) Evidence verifying that a qualified physician has taken a | 350 |
detailed occupational and exposure history of the exposed person | 351 |
from the exposed person or, if that person is deceased, from the | 352 |
person who is most knowledgeable about the exposures that form the | 353 |
basis of the mixed dust disease claim for a nonmalignant | 354 |
condition, including all of the following: | 355 |
(a) All of the exposed person's principal places of | 356 |
employment and exposures to airborne contaminants; | 357 |
(b) Whether each place of employment involved exposures to | 358 |
airborne contaminants, including, but not limited to, mixed dust, | 359 |
that can cause pulmonary impairment and, if that type of exposure | 360 |
is involved, the nature, duration, and level of the exposure; | 361 |
(2) Evidence verifying that a qualified physician has taken a | 362 |
detailed medical and smoking history of the exposed person, | 363 |
including a thorough review of the exposed person's past and | 364 |
present medical problems and the most probable causes of those | 365 |
medical problems; | 366 |
(3) A diagnosis by a qualified physician, based on a medical | 367 |
examination and pulmonary function testing of the exposed person, | 368 |
that all of the following apply to the exposed person: | 369 |
(a) The exposed person has a permanent respiratory impairment | 370 |
rating of at least class 2 as defined by and evaluated pursuant to | 371 |
the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. | 372 |
(b) The exposed person has mixed dust pneumoconiosis, based | 373 |
at a minimum on radiological or pathological evidence of mixed | 374 |
dust pneumoconiosis. In the case of death of an exposed person, if | 375 |
no pulmonary function testing results are available, the | 376 |
pathological or radiological evidence of mixed dust pneumoconiosis | 377 |
and evidence from a qualified physician who treated the exposed | 378 |
person showing that the mixed dust pneumoconiosis was a | 379 |
substantial contributing factor of the exposed person's physical | 380 |
impairment prior to death or a substantial contributing factor of | 381 |
the exposed person's death are sufficient to satisfy the minimum | 382 |
requirements for a prima-facie showing under division (B) of this | 383 |
section. | 384 |
(c) The mixed dust pneumoconiosis described in division | 385 |
(B)(3)(b) of this section is a substantial contributing factor to | 386 |
the exposed person's physical impairment or death, based at a | 387 |
minimum on a determination that the exposed person has any of the | 388 |
following: | 389 |
(i) A forced vital capacity below the predicted lower limit | 390 |
of normal; | 391 |
(ii) A total lung capacity, by plethysmography or timed gas | 392 |
dilution, below the predicted lower limit of normal; | 393 |
(iii) A chest x-ray showing irregular stellate (star-shaped) | 394 |
opacities in the upper lung field graded by a certified B-reader | 395 |
at least 1/1 on the ILO scale. | 396 |
(C)(1) No person shall bring or maintain a tort action | 397 |
alleging a mixed dust disease claim based upon lung cancer of an | 398 |
exposed person who is a smoker, in the absence of a prima-facie | 399 |
showing, in the manner described in division (A) of section | 400 |
2307.87 of the Revised Code, of all of the following minimum | 401 |
requirements: | 402 |
(a) A diagnosis by a board-certified pathologist, | 403 |
board-certified pulmonary specialist, or board-certified | 404 |
oncologist that the exposed person has primary lung cancer and | 405 |
that exposure to mixed dust is a substantial contributing factor | 406 |
to that cancer; | 407 |
(b) Evidence that is sufficient to demonstrate that at least | 408 |
ten years have elapsed from the date of the exposed person's first | 409 |
exposure to mixed dust until the date of diagnosis of the exposed | 410 |
person's primary lung cancer. The ten-year latency period | 411 |
described in this division is a rebuttable presumption, and the | 412 |
plaintiff has the burden of proof to rebut the presumption. | 413 |
(c) Both of the following: | 414 |
(i) Radiological or pathological evidence of mixed dust | 415 |
pneumoconiosis; | 416 |
(ii) Evidence of the exposed person's substantial | 417 |
occupational exposure to mixed dust. | 418 |
(2) If a plaintiff files a tort action that alleges a mixed | 419 |
dust disease claim based upon lung cancer of an exposed person who | 420 |
is a smoker and further alleges in the action that the plaintiff's | 421 |
exposure to mixed dust was the result of living with another | 422 |
person who, if the tort action had been filed by the other person, | 423 |
would have met the requirements specified in division (C)(1)(c) of | 424 |
this section and that the plaintiff lived with the other person | 425 |
for the period of time specified in division (GG) of section | 426 |
2307.84 of the Revised Code, the plaintiff is considered as having | 427 |
satisfied the requirements specified in division (C)(1)(c) of this | 428 |
section. | 429 |
(D) Evidence relating to physical impairment under this | 430 |
section, including pulmonary function testing and diffusing | 431 |
studies, shall comply with the technical recommendations for | 432 |
examinations, testing procedures, quality assurance, quality | 433 |
control, and equipment incorporated in the AMA guides to the | 434 |
evaluation of permanent impairment and reported as set forth in 20 | 435 |
C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. P, App. 1, Part A, Sec. 3.00 E. and F., and | 436 |
the interpretive standards set forth in the official statement of | 437 |
the American thoracic society entitled "lung function testing: | 438 |
selection of reference values and interpretive strategies" as | 439 |
published in American review of respiratory disease, | 440 |
1991:144:1202-1218. | 441 |
(E) All of the following apply to the presentation of | 442 |
prima-facie evidence that meets the requirements of division (B) | 443 |
or (C) of this section: | 444 |
(1) It does not result in any presumption at trial that the | 445 |
exposed person has a physical impairment that is caused by a mixed | 446 |
dust-related condition. | 447 |
(2) It is not conclusive as to the liability of any defendant | 448 |
in the case. | 449 |
(3) It is not admissible at trial. | 450 |
Sec. 2307.87. (A) The plaintiff in any tort action who | 451 |
alleges a silica claim or a mixed dust disease claim shall file, | 452 |
within thirty days after filing the complaint or other initial | 453 |
pleading, a written report and supporting test results | 454 |
constituting prima-facie evidence of the exposed person's physical | 455 |
impairment that meets the minimum requirements specified in | 456 |
division (B) or (C) of section 2307.85 or division (B) or (C) of | 457 |
section 2307.86 of the Revised Code, whichever is applicable. With | 458 |
respect to any silica claim or mixed dust disease claim that is | 459 |
pending on the effective date of this section, the plaintiff shall | 460 |
file the written report and supporting test results described in | 461 |
this division within one hundred twenty days following the | 462 |
effective date of this section. The defendant in the case shall be | 463 |
afforded a reasonable opportunity, upon the defendant's motion, to | 464 |
challenge the adequacy of the proffered prima-facie evidence of | 465 |
the physical impairment for failure to comply with the minimum | 466 |
requirements specified in division (B) or (C) of section 2307.85 | 467 |
or division (B) or (C) of section 2307.86 of the Revised Code, | 468 |
whichever is applicable. The defendant has one hundred twenty days | 469 |
from the date the prima-facie evidence of the exposed person's | 470 |
physical impairment is proffered to challenge the adequacy of that | 471 |
prima-facie evidence. If the defendant makes that challenge and | 472 |
uses a physician to do so, the physician must meet the | 473 |
requirements specified in divisions (V)(1) and (3) of section | 474 |
2307.84 of the Revised Code. | 475 |
(B) If the defendant challenges the adequacy of the | 476 |
prima-facie evidence of the exposed person's physical impairment | 477 |
as provided in division (A) of this section, the court shall | 478 |
determine from all of the evidence submitted whether the proffered | 479 |
prima-facie evidence meets the minimum requirements specified in | 480 |
division (B) or (C) of section 2307.85 or division (B) or (C) of | 481 |
section 2307.86 of the Revised Code, whichever is applicable. The | 482 |
court shall resolve the issue of whether the plaintiff has made | 483 |
the prima-facie showing required by any of those divisions as | 484 |
applicable, by applying the standard for resolving a motion for | 485 |
summary judgment. | 486 |
(C) The court shall administratively dismiss the plaintiff's | 487 |
claim without prejudice upon a finding of failure to make the | 488 |
prima-facie showing required by division (B) or (C) of section | 489 |
2307.85 or division (B) or (C) of section 2307.86 of the Revised | 490 |
Code, whichever is applicable. The court shall maintain its | 491 |
jurisdiction over any case that is administratively dismissed | 492 |
under this division. Any plaintiff whose case has been | 493 |
administratively dismissed may move to reinstate the plaintiff's | 494 |
case if the plaintiff makes a prima-facie showing that meets the | 495 |
minimum requirements specified in any of those divisions as | 496 |
applicable. | 497 |
Sec. 2307.88. (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of the | 498 |
Revised Code, with respect to any silica claim or mixed dust | 499 |
disease claim based upon a nonmalignant condition that is not | 500 |
barred as of the effective date of this section, the period of | 501 |
limitations shall not begin to run until the exposed person | 502 |
discovers, or through the exercise of reasonable diligence should | 503 |
have discovered, that the person has a physical impairment due to | 504 |
a nonmalignant condition. | 505 |
(B) A silica claim or a mixed dust disease claim that arises | 506 |
out of a nonmalignant condition shall be a distinct cause of | 507 |
action from a silica claim or a mixed dust disease claim, as the | 508 |
case may be, relating to the same exposed person that arises out | 509 |
of silica-related cancer or mixed dust-related cancer. No damages | 510 |
shall be awarded for fear or risk of cancer in any tort action | 511 |
asserting only a silica claim or a mixed dust disease claim for a | 512 |
nonmalignant condition. | 513 |
(C) No settlement of a silica claim or a mixed dust disease | 514 |
claim for a nonmalignant condition that is concluded after the | 515 |
effective date of this section shall require, as a condition of | 516 |
settlement, the release of any future claim for silica-related | 517 |
cancer or mixed dust-related cancer. | 518 |
Sec. 2307.89. The following apply to all tort actions for | 519 |
silica or mixed dust disease claims brought against a premises | 520 |
owner to recover damages or other relief for exposure to silica or | 521 |
mixed dust on the premises owner's property: | 522 |
(A) A premises owner is not liable for any injury to any | 523 |
individual resulting from silica or mixed dust exposure unless | 524 |
that individual's alleged exposure occurred while the individual | 525 |
was at the premises owner's property. | 526 |
(B) If exposure to silica or mixed dust is alleged to have | 527 |
occurred before January 1, 1972, it is presumed that a premises | 528 |
owner knew that this state had adopted safe levels of exposure for | 529 |
silica or mixed dust and that products containing silica or mixed | 530 |
dust were used on its property only at levels below those safe | 531 |
levels of exposure. To rebut this presumption, the plaintiff must | 532 |
prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the premises owner | 533 |
knew or should have known that the levels of silica or mixed dust | 534 |
in the immediate breathing zone of the plaintiff regularly | 535 |
exceeded the threshold limit values adopted by this state and that | 536 |
the premises owner allowed that condition to persist. | 537 |
(C)(1) A premises owner is presumed to be not liable for any | 538 |
injury to any invitee who is engaged to work with, install, or | 539 |
remove products containing silica or mixed dust on the premises | 540 |
owner's property if the invitee's employer holds itself out as | 541 |
qualified to perform the work. To rebut this presumption, the | 542 |
plaintiff must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that | 543 |
the premises owner has actual knowledge of the potential dangers | 544 |
of the products containing silica or mixed dust that is superior | 545 |
to the knowledge of both the invitee and the invitee's employer. | 546 |
(2) A premises owner that hired a contractor before January | 547 |
1, 1972, to perform the type of work at the premises owner's | 548 |
property that the contractor was qualified to perform is not | 549 |
liable for any injury to any individual resulting from silica or | 550 |
mixed dust exposure caused by any of the contractor's employees or | 551 |
agents on the premises owner's property unless the premises owner | 552 |
directed the activity that resulted in the injury or gave or | 553 |
denied permission for the critical acts that led to the | 554 |
individual's injury. | 555 |
(3) If exposure to silica or mixed dust is alleged to have | 556 |
occurred after January 1, 1972, a premises owner is not liable for | 557 |
any injury to any individual resulting from that exposure caused | 558 |
by a contractor's employee or agent on the premises owner's | 559 |
property unless the plaintiff establishes the premises owner's | 560 |
intentional violation of an established safety standard that is in | 561 |
effect at the time of the exposure and that the alleged violation | 562 |
was in the plaintiff's breathing zone and was the proximate cause | 563 |
of the plaintiff's medical condition. | 564 |
(D) As used in this section: | 565 |
(1) "Threshold limit values" means that, for the years 1946 | 566 |
through 1971, the concentration of silica or mixed dust in the | 567 |
worker's breathing zone did not exceed the following maximum | 568 |
allowable exposure limits for an eight-hour time-weighted average | 569 |
airborne concentration: | 570 |
(a) Silica, free or uncombined, over forty per cent: five | 571 |
million particles per cubic foot. For purposes of the maximum | 572 |
allowable concentrations for silica, the free silica content is | 573 |
the per cent of free silica in the fraction of the airborne dust | 574 |
in the breathing zone of the worker that is smaller than five | 575 |
microns in maximum diameter. | 576 |
(b) Silica, free or uncombined, between twenty and forty per | 577 |
cent: ten million particles per cubic foot. For purposes of the | 578 |
maximum allowable concentrations for silica, the free silica | 579 |
content is the per cent of free silica in the fraction of the | 580 |
airborne dust in the breathing zone of the worker that is smaller | 581 |
than five microns in maximum diameter. | 582 |
(c) Silica, free or uncombined, between ten and twenty per | 583 |
cent: twenty million particles per cubic foot. For purposes of the | 584 |
maximum allowable concentrations for silica, the free silica | 585 |
content is the per cent of free silica in the fraction of the | 586 |
airborne dust in the breathing zone of the worker that is smaller | 587 |
than five microns in maximum diameter. | 588 |
(2) "Established safety standard" means that, for the years | 589 |
after 1971, the concentration of silica or mixed dust in the | 590 |
breathing zone of the worker does not exceed the maximum allowable | 591 |
exposure limits for the eight-hour time-weighted average airborne | 592 |
concentration as promulgated by the occupational safety and health | 593 |
administration (OSHA) in effect at the time of the alleged | 594 |
exposure. | 595 |
(3) "Employee" means an individual who performs labor or | 596 |
provides construction services pursuant to a construction | 597 |
contract, as defined in section 4123.79 of the Revised Code, or a | 598 |
remodeling or repair contract, whether written or oral, if at | 599 |
least ten of the following criteria apply: | 600 |
(i) The individual is required to comply with instructions | 601 |
from the other contracting party regarding the manner or method of | 602 |
performing services. | 603 |
(ii) The individual is required by the other contracting | 604 |
party to have particular training. | 605 |
(iii) The individual's services are integrated into the | 606 |
regular functioning of the other contracting party. | 607 |
(iv) The individual is required to perform the work | 608 |
personally. | 609 |
(v) The individual is hired, supervised, or paid by the other | 610 |
contracting party. | 611 |
(vi) A continuing relationship exists between the individual | 612 |
and the other contracting party that contemplates continuing or | 613 |
recurring work even if the work is not full time. | 614 |
(vii) The individual's hours of work are established by the | 615 |
other contracting party. | 616 |
(viii) The individual is required to devote full time to the | 617 |
business of the other contracting party. | 618 |
(ix) The individual is required to perform the work on the | 619 |
premises of the other contracting party. | 620 |
(x) The individual is required to follow the order of work | 621 |
set by the other contracting party. | 622 |
(xi) The individual is required to make oral or written | 623 |
reports of progress to the other contracting party. | 624 |
(xii) The individual is paid for services on a regular basis, | 625 |
including hourly, weekly, or monthly. | 626 |
(xiii) The individual's expenses are paid for by the other | 627 |
contracting party. | 628 |
(xiv) The individual's tools and materials are furnished by | 629 |
the other contracting party. | 630 |
(xv) The individual is provided with the facilities used to | 631 |
perform services. | 632 |
(xvi) The individual does not realize a profit or suffer a | 633 |
loss as a result of the services provided. | 634 |
(xvii) The individual is not performing services for a number | 635 |
of employers at the same time. | 636 |
(xviii) The individual does not make the same services | 637 |
available to the general public. | 638 |
(xix) The other contracting party has a right to discharge | 639 |
the individual. | 640 |
(xx) The individual has the right to end the relationship | 641 |
with the other contracting party without incurring liability | 642 |
pursuant to an employment contract or agreement. | 643 |
Sec. 2307.90. (A) Nothing in sections 2307.84 to 2307.90 of | 644 |
the Revised Code is intended to do, and nothing in any of those | 645 |
sections is interpreted to do, either of the following: | 646 |
(1) Affect the rights of any party in bankruptcy proceedings; | 647 |
(2) Affect the ability of any person who is able to make a | 648 |
showing that the person satisfies the claim criteria for | 649 |
compensable claims or demands under a trust established pursuant | 650 |
to a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States | 651 |
Bankruptcy Code, to make a claim or demand against that trust. | 652 |
(B) Sections 2307.84 to 2307.90 of the Revised Code shall not | 653 |
affect the scope or operation of any workers' compensation law or | 654 |
veterans' benefit program or the exclusive remedy of subrogation | 655 |
under the provisions of that law or program and shall not | 656 |
authorize any lawsuit that is barred by any provision of any | 657 |
workers' compensation law. | 658 |
Sec. 2307.901. (A) A holder has no obligation to, and has no | 659 |
liability to, the covered entity or to any person with respect to | 660 |
any obligation or liability of the covered entity in a silica | 661 |
claim or a mixed dust disease claim under the doctrine of piercing | 662 |
the corporate veil unless the person seeking to pierce the | 663 |
corporate veil demonstrates all of the following: | 664 |
(1) The holder exerted such control over the covered entity | 665 |
that the covered entity had no separate mind, will, or existence | 666 |
of its own. | 667 |
(2) The holder caused the covered entity to be used for the | 668 |
purpose of perpetrating, and the covered entity perpetrated an | 669 |
actual fraud on the person seeking to pierce the corporate veil | 670 |
primarily for the direct pecuniary benefit of the holder. | 671 |
(3) The person seeking to pierce the corporate veil sustained | 672 |
an injury or unjust loss as a direct result of the control | 673 |
described in division (A)(1) of this section and the fraud | 674 |
described in division (A)(2) of this section. | 675 |
(B) A court shall not find that the holder exerted such | 676 |
control over the covered entity that the covered entity did not | 677 |
have a separate mind, will, or existence of its own or to have | 678 |
caused the covered entity to be used for the purpose of | 679 |
perpetrating a fraud solely as a result of any of the following | 680 |
actions, events, or relationships: | 681 |
(1) The holder is an affiliate of the covered entity and | 682 |
provides legal, accounting, treasury, cash management, human | 683 |
resources, administrative, or other similar services to the | 684 |
covered entity, leases assets to the covered entity, or makes its | 685 |
employees available to the covered entity. | 686 |
(2) The holder loans funds to the covered entity or | 687 |
guarantees the obligations of the covered entity. | 688 |
(3) The officers and directors of the holder are also | 689 |
officers and directors of the covered entity. | 690 |
(4) The covered entity makes payments of dividends or other | 691 |
distributions to the holder or repays loans owed to the holder. | 692 |
(5) In the case of a covered entity that is a limited | 693 |
liability company, the holder or its employees or agents serve as | 694 |
the manager of the covered entity. | 695 |
(C) The person seeking to pierce the corporate veil has the | 696 |
burden of proof on each and every element of the person's claim | 697 |
and must prove each element by a preponderance of the evidence. | 698 |
(D) Any liability of the holder described in division (A) of | 699 |
this section for an obligation or liability that is limited by | 700 |
that division is exclusive and preempts any other obligation or | 701 |
liability imposed upon that holder for that obligation or | 702 |
liability under common law or otherwise. | 703 |
(E) This section is intended to codify the elements of the | 704 |
common law cause of action for piercing the corporate veil and to | 705 |
abrogate the common law cause of action and remedies relating to | 706 |
piercing the corporate veil in silica claims and mixed dust | 707 |
disease claims. Nothing in this section shall be construed as | 708 |
creating a right or cause of action that did not exist under the | 709 |
common law as it existed on the effective date of this section. | 710 |
(F) This section applies to all silica claims and mixed dust | 711 |
disease claims commenced on or after the effective date of this | 712 |
section or commenced prior to and pending on the effective date of | 713 |
this section. | 714 |
(G) This section applies to all actions asserting the | 715 |
doctrine of piercing the corporate veil brought against a holder | 716 |
if any of the following apply: | 717 |
(1) The holder is an individual and resides in this state. | 718 |
(2) The holder is a corporation organized under the laws of | 719 |
this state. | 720 |
(3) The holder is a corporation with its principal place of | 721 |
business in this state. | 722 |
(4) The holder is a foreign corporation that is authorized to | 723 |
conduct or has conducted business in this state. | 724 |
(5) The holder is a foreign corporation the parent | 725 |
corporation of which is authorized to conduct business in this | 726 |
state. | 727 |
(6) The person seeking to pierce the corporate veil is a | 728 |
resident of this state. | 729 |
(H) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise | 730 |
requires: | 731 |
(1) "Affiliate" and "beneficial owner" have the same meanings | 732 |
as in section 1704.01 of the Revised Code. | 733 |
(2) "Mixed dust," "mixed dust disease claim," "silica," and | 734 |
"silica claim" have the same meanings as in section 2307.84 of the | 735 |
Revised Code. | 736 |
(3) "Covered entity" means a corporation, limited liability | 737 |
company, limited partnership, or any other entity organized under | 738 |
the laws of any jurisdiction, domestic or foreign, in which the | 739 |
shareholders, owners, or members are generally not responsible for | 740 |
the debts and obligations of the entity. Nothing in this section | 741 |
limits or otherwise affects the liabilities imposed on a general | 742 |
partner of a limited partnership. | 743 |
(4) "Holder" means a person who is the holder, beneficial | 744 |
owner, or subscriber of shares or any other ownership interest of | 745 |
a covered entity, a member of a covered entity, or an affiliate of | 746 |
any person who is the holder, beneficial owner, or subscriber of | 747 |
shares or any other ownership interest of a covered entity. | 748 |
(5) "Piercing the corporate veil" means any and all common | 749 |
law doctrines by which a holder may be liable for an obligation or | 750 |
liability of a covered entity on the basis that the holder | 751 |
controlled the covered entity, the holder is or was the alter ego | 752 |
of the covered entity, or the covered entity has been used for the | 753 |
purpose of actual or constructive fraud or as a sham to perpetrate | 754 |
a fraud or any other common law doctrine by which the covered | 755 |
entity is disregarded for purposes of imposing liability on a | 756 |
holder for the debts or obligations of that covered entity. | 757 |
(6) "Person" has the same meaning as in section 1701.01 of | 758 |
the Revised Code. | 759 |
Section 2. (A) As used in this section, "exposed person," | 760 |
"mixed dust," "mixed dust disease claim," "silica," "silica | 761 |
claim," and "substantial contributing factor" have the same | 762 |
meanings as in section 2307.84 of the Revised Code. | 763 |
(B) The General Assembly acknowledges the Court's authority | 764 |
in prescribing rules governing practice and procedure in the | 765 |
courts of this state, as provided by Section 5 of Article IV of | 766 |
the Ohio Constitution. | 767 |
(C) The General Assembly hereby requests the Supreme Court to | 768 |
adopt rules to specify procedures for venue and consolidation of | 769 |
silica claims or mixed dust disease claims brought pursuant to | 770 |
sections 2307.84 to 2307.90 of the Revised Code. | 771 |
(D) With respect to procedures for venue in regard to silica | 772 |
claims or mixed dust disease claims, the General Assembly hereby | 773 |
requests the Supreme Court to adopt a rule that requires that a | 774 |
silica claim or a mixed dust disease claim meet specific nexus | 775 |
requirements, including the requirement that the plaintiff be | 776 |
domiciled in Ohio or that Ohio is the state in which the | 777 |
plaintiff's exposure to silica or mixed dust is a substantial | 778 |
contributing factor. | 779 |
(E) With respect to procedures for consolidation of silica | 780 |
claims or mixed dust disease claims, the General Assembly hereby | 781 |
requests the Supreme Court to adopt a rule that permits | 782 |
consolidation of silica claims or mixed dust disease claims only | 783 |
with the consent of all parties, and in absence of that consent, | 784 |
permits a court to consolidate for trial only those silica claims | 785 |
or mixed dust disease claims that relate to the same exposed | 786 |
person and members of the exposed person's household. | 787 |
Section 3. If any item of law that constitutes the whole or | 788 |
part of a section of law contained in this act, or if any | 789 |
application of any item of law that constitutes the whole or part | 790 |
of a section of law contained in this act, is held invalid, the | 791 |
invalidity does not affect other items of law or applications of | 792 |
items of law that can be given effect without the invalid item of | 793 |
law or application. To this end, the items of law of which the | 794 |
sections contained in this act are composed, and their | 795 |
applications, are independent and severable. | 796 |
Section 4. If any item of law that constitutes the whole or | 797 |
part of a section of law contained in this act, or if any | 798 |
application of any item of law contained in this act, is held to | 799 |
be preempted by federal law, the preemption of the item of law or | 800 |
its application does not affect other items of law or applications | 801 |
that can be given affect. The items of law of which the sections | 802 |
of this act are composed, and their applications, are independent | 803 |
and severable. | 804 |