As Introduced

125th General Assembly
Regular Session
2003-2004
H. B. No. 342


REPRESENTATIVE Widener



A BILL
To enact sections 2307.84 to 2307.90 and section 1
2307.901 of the Revised Code to establish minimum 2
medical requirements for filing certain silica 3
claims or mixed dust disease claims, to establish 4
premises liability in relation to those claims, 5
and to prescribe the requirements for shareholder 6
liability for those claims under the doctrine of 7
piercing the corporate veil.8


BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF OHIO:

       Section 1. That sections 2307.84, 2307.85, 2307.86, 2307.87, 9
2307.88, 2307.89, 2307.90, and 2307.901 of the Revised Code be 10
enacted to read as follows:11

       Sec. 2307.84.  As used in sections 2307.84 to 2307.90 of the 12
Revised Code:13

       (A) "AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment" 14
means the American medical association's guides to the evaluation 15
of permanent impairment (fifth edition 2000) as may be modified by 16
the American medical association.17

       (B) "Board-certified internist" means a medical doctor who is 18
currently certified by the American board of internal medicine.19

       (C) "Board-certified occupational medicine specialist" means 20
a medical doctor who is currently certified by the American board 21
of internal medicine or the American board of preventive medicine 22
in the specialty of occupational medicine.23

       (D) "Board-certified oncologist" means a medical doctor who 24
is currently certified by the American board of internal medicine 25
in the subspecialty of medical oncology.26

       (E) "Board-certified pathologist" means a medical doctor who 27
is currently certified by the American board of pathology.28

       (F) "Board-certified pulmonary specialist" means a medical 29
doctor who is currently certified by the American board of 30
internal medicine in the subspecialty of pulmonary medicine.31

       (G) "Certified B-reader" means an individual qualified as a 32
"final" or "B-reader" as defined in 42 C.F.R. section 37.51(b), as 33
amended.34

       (H) "Exposed person" means either of the following, whichever 35
is applicable:36

       (1) A person whose exposure to silica is the basis for a 37
silica claim under section 2307.85 of the Revised Code;38

       (2) A person whose exposure to mixed dust is the basis for a 39
mixed dust disease claim under section 2307.86 of the Revised 40
Code.41

       (I) "Forced vital capacity" means forced vital capacity that 42
is maximal volume of air expired with maximum effort from a 43
position of full inspiration.44

       (J) "ILO scale" means the system for the classification of 45
chest x-rays set forth in the international labour office's 46
guidelines for the use of ILO international classification of 47
radiographs of pneumoconioses (1980), as amended.48

       (K) "Lung cancer" means a malignant tumor in which the 49
primary site of origin of the cancer is inside the lungs.50

       (L) "Mixed dust" means a mixture of dusts composed of silica 51
or asbestos or one or more other dusts.52

       (M) "Mixed dust disease claim" means any claim for damages, 53
losses, indemnification, contribution, or other relief arising out 54
of, based on, or in any way related to mixed dust pneumoconiosis. 55
"Mixed dust disease claim" includes a claim made by or on behalf 56
of any person who has been exposed to mixed dust, or any 57
representative, spouse, parent, child, or other relative of that 58
person, for injury, including mental or emotional injury, death, 59
or loss to person, risk of disease or other injury, costs of 60
medical monitoring or surveillance, or any other effects on the 61
person's health that are caused by the person's exposure to mixed 62
dust.63

       (N) "Mixed dust pneumoconiosis" means the interstitial lung 64
disease caused by the pulmonary response to inhaled mixed dusts.65

       (O) "Nonmalignant condition" means a condition, other than a 66
diagnosed cancer, that is caused or may be caused by either of the 67
following, whichever is applicable:68

       (1) Silica, as provided in section 2307.85 of the Revised 69
Code;70

       (2) Mixed dust, as provided in section 2307.86 of the Revised 71
Code.72

       (P) "Pathological evidence of mixed dust pneumoconiosis" 73
means a statement by a board-certified pathologist that more than 74
one representative section of lung tissue uninvolved with any 75
other disease process demonstrates a pattern of peribronchiolar 76
and parenchymal stellate (star-shaped) nodular scarring and that 77
there is no other more likely explanation for the presence of the 78
fibrosis.79

       (Q) "Pathological evidence of silicosis" means a statement by 80
a board-certified pathologist that more than one representative 81
section of lung tissue uninvolved with any other disease process 82
demonstrates a pattern of round silica nodules (well-organized 83
concentric whorls of collagen surrounded by inflammatory cells) in 84
the lung parenchyma and that there is no other more likely 85
explanation for the presence of the fibrosis.86

       (R) "Physical impairment" means any of the following, 87
whichever is applicable:88

       (1) A nonmalignant condition that meets the minimum 89
requirements of division (B) of section 2307.85 of the Revised 90
Code or lung cancer of an exposed person who is a smoker that 91
meets the minimum requirements of division (C) of section 2307.85 92
of the Revised Code;93

       (2) A nonmalignant condition that meets the minimum 94
requirements of division (B) of section 2307.86 of the Revised 95
Code or lung cancer of an exposed person who is a smoker that 96
meets the minimum requirements of division (C) of section 2307.86 97
of the Revised Code.98

       (S) "Plethysmography" means a test for determining lung 99
volume, also known as "body plethysmography," in which the subject 100
of the test is enclosed in a chamber that is equipped to measure 101
pressure, flow, or volume changes.102

       (T) "Predicted lower limit of normal" means the fifth 103
percentile of healthy populations based on age, height, and 104
gender, as referenced in the AMA guides to the evaluation of 105
permanent impairment.106

       (U) "Premises owner" means a person who owns, in whole or in 107
part, leases, rents, maintains, or controls privately owned lands, 108
ways, or waters, or any buildings and structures on those lands, 109
ways, or waters, and all privately owned and state-owned lands, 110
ways, or waters leased to a private person, firm, or organization, 111
including any buildings and structures on those lands, ways, or 112
waters.113

       (V) "Qualified physician" means a medical doctor who is 114
providing a diagnosis for purposes of constituting prima-facie 115
evidence of an exposed person's physical impairment that meets the 116
requirements specified in section 2307.85 or 2307.86 of the 117
Revised Code, whichever is applicable, and who meets the following 118
requirements:119

       (1) The medical doctor is a board-certified internist, 120
pulmonary specialist, oncologist, pathologist, or occupational 121
medicine specialist.122

       (2) The medical doctor is actually treating or has treated 123
the exposed person and has or had a doctor-patient relationship 124
with the person.125

       (3) The medical doctor spends not more than twenty-five per 126
cent of the medical doctor's professional practice time in 127
providing consulting or expert services in connection with actual 128
or potential tort actions, and the medical doctor's medical group, 129
professional corporation, clinic, or other affiliated group earns 130
not more than twenty per cent of its revenues from providing those 131
services.132

       (W) "Radiological evidence of mixed dust pneumoconiosis" 133
means a chest x-ray showing irregular opacities in the upper lung 134
fields graded by a certified B-reader as at least 1/1 on the ILO 135
scale.136

       (X) "Radiological evidence of silicosis" means a chest x-ray 137
showing small rounded opacities in the upper lung fields graded by 138
a certified B-reader as at least 1/1 on the ILO scale.139

       (Y) "Regular basis" means on a frequent or recurring basis.140

       (Z) "Silica" means a group of naturally occurring crystalline 141
forms of silicon dioxide, including, but not limited to, quartz 142
and sand.143

       (AA) "Silica claim" means any claim for damages, losses, 144
indemnification, contribution, or other relief arising out of, 145
based on, or in any way related to silica. "Silica claim" includes 146
a claim made by or on behalf of any person who has been exposed to 147
silica, or any representative, spouse, parent, child, or other 148
relative of that person, for injury, including mental or emotional 149
injury, death, or loss to person, risk of disease or other injury, 150
costs of medical monitoring or surveillance, or any other effects 151
on the person's health that are caused by the person's exposure to 152
silica.153

       (BB) "Silicosis" means an interstitial lung disease caused by 154
the pulmonary response to inhaled silica.155

       (CC) "Smoker" means a person who has smoked the equivalent of 156
one-pack year, as specified in the written report of a qualified 157
physician pursuant to section 2307.85 or 2307.86 and section 158
2307.87 of the Revised Code, during the last fifteen years.159

       (DD) "Spirometry" means the measurement of volume of air 160
inhaled or exhaled by the lung.161

       (EE) "Substantial contributing factor" means both of the 162
following:163

       (1) Exposure to silica or mixed dust is the predominate cause 164
of the physical impairment alleged in the silica claim or mixed 165
dust disease claim, whichever is applicable.166

       (2) A qualified physician has determined with a reasonable 167
degree of medical certainty that the physical impairment of the 168
exposed person would not have occurred but for the silica or mixed 169
dust exposures.170

       (FF) "Substantial occupational exposure to silica" means 171
employment for a cumulative period of at least five years in an 172
industry and an occupation in which, for a substantial portion of 173
a normal work year for that occupation, the exposed person did any 174
of the following:175

       (1) Handled silica;176

       (2) Fabricated silica-containing products so that the person 177
was exposed to silica in the fabrication process;178

       (3) Altered, repaired, or otherwise worked with a 179
silica-containing product in a manner that exposed the person on a 180
regular basis to silica;181

       (4) Worked in close proximity to other workers engaged in any 182
of the activities described in division (FF)(1), (2), or (3) of 183
this section in a manner that exposed the person on a regular 184
basis to silica.185

       (GG) "Substantial occupational exposure to mixed dust" means 186
employment for a cumulative period of at least five years in an 187
industry and an occupation in which, for a substantial portion of 188
a normal work year for that occupation, the exposed person did any 189
of the following:190

       (1) Handled mixed dust;191

       (2) Fabricated mixed dust-containing products so that the 192
person was exposed to mixed dust in the fabrication process;193

       (3) Altered, repaired, or otherwise worked with a mixed 194
dust-containing product in a manner that exposed the person on a 195
regular basis to mixed dust;196

       (4) Worked in close proximity to other workers engaged in any 197
of the activities described in division (GG)(1), (2), or (3) of 198
this section in a manner that exposed the person on a regular 199
basis to mixed dust.200

       (HH) "Timed gas dilution" means a method for measuring total 201
lung capacity in which the subject breathes into a spirometer 202
containing a known concentration of an inert and insoluble gas for 203
a specific time, and the concentration of the inert and insoluble 204
gas in the lung is then compared to the concentration of that type 205
of gas in the spirometer.206

       (II) "Tort action" means a civil action for damages for 207
injury, death, or loss to person. "Tort action" includes a product 208
liability claim that is subject to sections 2307.71 to 2307.80 of 209
the Revised Code or a silica claim or mixed dust claim that is 210
subject to sections 2307.84 to 2307.88 of the Revised Code. "Tort 211
action" does not include any of the following:212

       (1) A civil action for damages for a breach of contract or 213
another agreement between persons;214

       (2) A civil action relating to any workers' compensation law;215

       (3) A civil action alleging any claim or demand made against 216
a trust established pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 524(g);217

       (4) A civil action alleging any claim or demand made against 218
a trust established pursuant to a plan of reorganization confirmed 219
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.220

       (JJ) "Total lung capacity" means the volume of air contained 221
in the lungs at the end of a maximal inspiration.222

       (KK) "Veterans' benefit program" means any program for 223
benefits in connection with military service administered by the 224
veterans' administration under title 38 of the United States Code.225

        (LL) "Workers' compensation law" means Chapters 4121., 4123., 226
4127., and 4131. of the Revised Code.227

       Sec. 2307.85. (A) Physical impairment of the exposed person, 228
to which the person's exposure to silica is a substantial 229
contributing factor, shall be an essential element of a silica 230
claim in any tort action.231

       (B) No person shall bring or maintain a tort action alleging 232
a silica claim based on a nonmalignant condition in the absence of 233
a prima-facie showing, in the manner described in division (A) of 234
section 2307.87 of the Revised Code, that the exposed person has a 235
physical impairment, that the physical impairment is a result of a 236
medical condition, and that the person's exposure to silica is a 237
substantial contributing factor to the medical condition. That 238
prima-facie showing shall include all of the following minimum 239
requirements:240

       (1) Evidence verifying that a qualified physician has taken a 241
detailed occupational and exposure history of the exposed person 242
from the exposed person or, if that person is deceased, from the 243
person who is most knowledgeable about the exposures that form the 244
basis of the silica claim for a nonmalignant condition, including 245
all of the following:246

       (a) All of the exposed person's principal places of 247
employment and exposures to airborne contaminants;248

       (b) Whether each place of employment involved exposures to 249
airborne contaminants, including, but not limited to, silica or 250
other disease causing dusts, that can cause pulmonary impairment 251
and, if that type of exposure is involved, the nature, duration, 252
and level of exposure.253

       (2) Evidence verifying that a qualified physician has taken a 254
detailed medical and smoking history of the exposed person, 255
including a thorough review of the exposed person's past and 256
present medical problems and the most probable causes of those 257
medical problems;258

       (3) A diagnosis by a qualified physician, based on a medical 259
examination and pulmonary function testing of the exposed person, 260
that all of the following apply to the exposed person:261

       (a) The exposed person has a permanent respiratory impairment 262
rating of at least class 2 as defined by and evaluated pursuant to 263
the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment.264

       (b) The exposed person has silicosis based at a minimum on 265
radiological or pathological evidence of silicosis. In the case of 266
death of an exposed person, if no pulmonary function testing 267
results are available, the pathological or radiological evidence 268
of silicosis and evidence from a qualified physician who treated 269
the exposed person showing that the silicosis was a substantial 270
contributing factor of the exposed person's physical impairment 271
prior to death or a substantial contributing factor of the exposed 272
person's death are sufficient to satisfy the minimum requirements 273
for a prima-facie showing under division (B) of this section. 274

       (c) The silicosis described in division (B)(3)(b) of this 275
section is a substantial contributing factor to the exposed 276
person's physical impairment or death, based at a minimum on a 277
determination that the exposed person has any of the following:278

       (i) A forced vital capacity below the predicted lower limit 279
of normal;280

       (ii) A total lung capacity, by plethysmography or timed gas 281
dilution, below the predicted lower limit of normal;282

       (iii) A chest x-ray showing small, rounded opacities in the 283
upper lung fields graded by a certified B-reader at least 1/1 on 284
the ILO scale.285

       (C)(1) No person shall bring or maintain a tort action 286
alleging a silica claim based upon lung cancer of an exposed 287
person who is a smoker, in the absence of a prima-facie showing, 288
in the manner described in division (A) of section 2307.87 of the 289
Revised Code, of all of the following minimum requirements:290

       (a) A diagnosis by a board-certified pathologist, 291
board-certified pulmonary specialist, or board-certified 292
oncologist that the exposed person has primary lung cancer and 293
that exposure to silica is a substantial contributing factor to 294
that cancer;295

       (b) Evidence that is sufficient to demonstrate that at least 296
ten years have elapsed from the date of the exposed person's first 297
exposure to silica until the date of diagnosis of the exposed 298
person's primary lung cancer. The ten-year latency period 299
described in this division is a rebuttable presumption and the 300
plaintiff has the burden of proof to rebut the presumption.301

       (c) Both of the following:302

       (i) Radiological or pathological evidence of silicosis;303

       (ii) Evidence of the exposed person's substantial 304
occupational exposure to silica.305

       (2) If a plaintiff files a tort action that alleges a silica 306
claim based upon lung cancer of an exposed person who is a smoker 307
and further alleges in the action that the plaintiff's exposure to 308
silica was the result of living with another person who, if the 309
tort action had been filed by the other person, would have met the 310
requirements specified in division (C)(1)(c) of this section and 311
that the plaintiff lived with the other person for the period of 312
time specified in division (FF) of section 2307.84 of the Revised 313
Code, the plaintiff is considered as having satisfied the 314
requirements specified in division (C)(1)(c) of this section.315

       (D) Evidence relating to physical impairment under this 316
section, including pulmonary function testing and diffusing 317
studies, shall comply with the technical recommendations for 318
examinations, testing procedures, quality assurance, quality 319
control, and equipment incorporated in the AMA guides to the 320
evaluation of permanent impairment and reported as set forth in 20 321
C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. P, App. 1, Part A, Sec. 3.00 E. and F., and 322
the interpretive standards set forth in the official statement of 323
the American thoracic society entitled "lung function testing: 324
selection of reference values and interpretive strategies" as 325
published in American review of respiratory disease, 326
1991:144:1202-1218.327

       (E) All of the following apply to the presentation of 328
prima-facie evidence that meets the requirements of division (B) 329
or (C) of this section:330

       (1) It does not result in any presumption at trial that the 331
exposed person has a physical impairment that is caused by a 332
silica-related condition.333

       (2) It is not conclusive as to the liability of any defendant 334
in the case.335

       (3) It is not admissible at trial.336

       Sec. 2307.86.  (A) Physical impairment of the exposed person, 337
to which the person's exposure to mixed dust is a substantial 338
contributing factor, shall be an essential element of a mixed dust 339
disease claim in any tort action.340

       (B) No person shall bring or maintain a tort action alleging 341
a mixed dust disease claim based on a nonmalignant condition in 342
the absence of a prima-facie showing, in the manner described in 343
division (A) of section 2307.87 of the Revised Code, that the 344
exposed person has a physical impairment, that the physical 345
impairment is a result of a medical condition, and that the 346
person's exposure to mixed dust is a substantial contributing 347
factor to the medical condition. That prima-facie showing shall 348
include all of the following minimum requirements:349

       (1) Evidence verifying that a qualified physician has taken a 350
detailed occupational and exposure history of the exposed person 351
from the exposed person or, if that person is deceased, from the 352
person who is most knowledgeable about the exposures that form the 353
basis of the mixed dust disease claim for a nonmalignant 354
condition, including all of the following:355

       (a) All of the exposed person's principal places of 356
employment and exposures to airborne contaminants;357

       (b) Whether each place of employment involved exposures to 358
airborne contaminants, including, but not limited to, mixed dust, 359
that can cause pulmonary impairment and, if that type of exposure 360
is involved, the nature, duration, and level of the exposure;361

       (2) Evidence verifying that a qualified physician has taken a 362
detailed medical and smoking history of the exposed person, 363
including a thorough review of the exposed person's past and 364
present medical problems and the most probable causes of those 365
medical problems;366

       (3) A diagnosis by a qualified physician, based on a medical 367
examination and pulmonary function testing of the exposed person, 368
that all of the following apply to the exposed person:369

       (a) The exposed person has a permanent respiratory impairment 370
rating of at least class 2 as defined by and evaluated pursuant to 371
the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment.372

       (b) The exposed person has mixed dust pneumoconiosis, based 373
at a minimum on radiological or pathological evidence of mixed 374
dust pneumoconiosis. In the case of death of an exposed person, if 375
no pulmonary function testing results are available, the 376
pathological or radiological evidence of mixed dust pneumoconiosis 377
and evidence from a qualified physician who treated the exposed 378
person showing that the mixed dust pneumoconiosis was a 379
substantial contributing factor of the exposed person's physical 380
impairment prior to death or a substantial contributing factor of 381
the exposed person's death are sufficient to satisfy the minimum 382
requirements for a prima-facie showing under division (B) of this 383
section.384

       (c) The mixed dust pneumoconiosis described in division 385
(B)(3)(b) of this section is a substantial contributing factor to 386
the exposed person's physical impairment or death, based at a 387
minimum on a determination that the exposed person has any of the 388
following:389

       (i) A forced vital capacity below the predicted lower limit 390
of normal;391

       (ii) A total lung capacity, by plethysmography or timed gas 392
dilution, below the predicted lower limit of normal;393

       (iii) A chest x-ray showing irregular stellate (star-shaped) 394
opacities in the upper lung field graded by a certified B-reader 395
at least 1/1 on the ILO scale.396

       (C)(1) No person shall bring or maintain a tort action 397
alleging a mixed dust disease claim based upon lung cancer of an 398
exposed person who is a smoker, in the absence of a prima-facie 399
showing, in the manner described in division (A) of section 400
2307.87 of the Revised Code, of all of the following minimum 401
requirements:402

       (a) A diagnosis by a board-certified pathologist, 403
board-certified pulmonary specialist, or board-certified 404
oncologist that the exposed person has primary lung cancer and 405
that exposure to mixed dust is a substantial contributing factor 406
to that cancer;407

       (b) Evidence that is sufficient to demonstrate that at least 408
ten years have elapsed from the date of the exposed person's first 409
exposure to mixed dust until the date of diagnosis of the exposed 410
person's primary lung cancer. The ten-year latency period 411
described in this division is a rebuttable presumption, and the 412
plaintiff has the burden of proof to rebut the presumption.413

       (c) Both of the following:414

       (i) Radiological or pathological evidence of mixed dust 415
pneumoconiosis;416

       (ii) Evidence of the exposed person's substantial 417
occupational exposure to mixed dust.418

       (2) If a plaintiff files a tort action that alleges a mixed 419
dust disease claim based upon lung cancer of an exposed person who 420
is a smoker and further alleges in the action that the plaintiff's 421
exposure to mixed dust was the result of living with another 422
person who, if the tort action had been filed by the other person, 423
would have met the requirements specified in division (C)(1)(c) of 424
this section and that the plaintiff lived with the other person 425
for the period of time specified in division (GG) of section 426
2307.84 of the Revised Code, the plaintiff is considered as having 427
satisfied the requirements specified in division (C)(1)(c) of this 428
section.429

       (D) Evidence relating to physical impairment under this 430
section, including pulmonary function testing and diffusing 431
studies, shall comply with the technical recommendations for 432
examinations, testing procedures, quality assurance, quality 433
control, and equipment incorporated in the AMA guides to the 434
evaluation of permanent impairment and reported as set forth in 20 435
C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. P, App. 1, Part A, Sec. 3.00 E. and F., and 436
the interpretive standards set forth in the official statement of 437
the American thoracic society entitled "lung function testing: 438
selection of reference values and interpretive strategies" as 439
published in American review of respiratory disease, 440
1991:144:1202-1218.441

       (E) All of the following apply to the presentation of 442
prima-facie evidence that meets the requirements of division (B) 443
or (C) of this section:444

       (1) It does not result in any presumption at trial that the 445
exposed person has a physical impairment that is caused by a mixed 446
dust-related condition. 447

       (2) It is not conclusive as to the liability of any defendant 448
in the case.449

       (3) It is not admissible at trial.450

       Sec. 2307.87. (A) The plaintiff in any tort action who 451
alleges a silica claim or a mixed dust disease claim shall file, 452
within thirty days after filing the complaint or other initial 453
pleading, a written report and supporting test results 454
constituting prima-facie evidence of the exposed person's physical 455
impairment that meets the minimum requirements specified in 456
division (B) or (C) of section 2307.85 or division (B) or (C) of 457
section 2307.86 of the Revised Code, whichever is applicable. With 458
respect to any silica claim or mixed dust disease claim that is 459
pending on the effective date of this section, the plaintiff shall 460
file the written report and supporting test results described in 461
this division within one hundred twenty days following the 462
effective date of this section. The defendant in the case shall be 463
afforded a reasonable opportunity, upon the defendant's motion, to 464
challenge the adequacy of the proffered prima-facie evidence of 465
the physical impairment for failure to comply with the minimum 466
requirements specified in division (B) or (C) of section 2307.85 467
or division (B) or (C) of section 2307.86 of the Revised Code, 468
whichever is applicable. The defendant has one hundred twenty days 469
from the date the prima-facie evidence of the exposed person's 470
physical impairment is proffered to challenge the adequacy of that 471
prima-facie evidence. If the defendant makes that challenge and 472
uses a physician to do so, the physician must meet the 473
requirements specified in divisions (V)(1) and (3) of section 474
2307.84 of the Revised Code.475

       (B) If the defendant challenges the adequacy of the 476
prima-facie evidence of the exposed person's physical impairment 477
as provided in division (A) of this section, the court shall 478
determine from all of the evidence submitted whether the proffered 479
prima-facie evidence meets the minimum requirements specified in 480
division (B) or (C) of section 2307.85 or division (B) or (C) of 481
section 2307.86 of the Revised Code, whichever is applicable. The 482
court shall resolve the issue of whether the plaintiff has made 483
the prima-facie showing required by any of those divisions as 484
applicable, by applying the standard for resolving a motion for 485
summary judgment.486

       (C) The court shall administratively dismiss the plaintiff's 487
claim without prejudice upon a finding of failure to make the 488
prima-facie showing required by division (B) or (C) of section 489
2307.85 or division (B) or (C) of section 2307.86 of the Revised 490
Code, whichever is applicable. The court shall maintain its 491
jurisdiction over any case that is administratively dismissed 492
under this division. Any plaintiff whose case has been 493
administratively dismissed may move to reinstate the plaintiff's 494
case if the plaintiff makes a prima-facie showing that meets the 495
minimum requirements specified in any of those divisions as 496
applicable.497

       Sec. 2307.88.  (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of the 498
Revised Code, with respect to any silica claim or mixed dust 499
disease claim based upon a nonmalignant condition that is not 500
barred as of the effective date of this section, the period of 501
limitations shall not begin to run until the exposed person 502
discovers, or through the exercise of reasonable diligence should 503
have discovered, that the person has a physical impairment due to 504
a nonmalignant condition.505

       (B) A silica claim or a mixed dust disease claim that arises 506
out of a nonmalignant condition shall be a distinct cause of 507
action from a silica claim or a mixed dust disease claim, as the 508
case may be, relating to the same exposed person that arises out 509
of silica-related cancer or mixed dust-related cancer. No damages 510
shall be awarded for fear or risk of cancer in any tort action 511
asserting only a silica claim or a mixed dust disease claim for a 512
nonmalignant condition.513

       (C) No settlement of a silica claim or a mixed dust disease 514
claim for a nonmalignant condition that is concluded after the 515
effective date of this section shall require, as a condition of 516
settlement, the release of any future claim for silica-related 517
cancer or mixed dust-related cancer.518

       Sec. 2307.89. The following apply to all tort actions for 519
silica or mixed dust disease claims brought against a premises 520
owner to recover damages or other relief for exposure to silica or 521
mixed dust on the premises owner's property:522

       (A) A premises owner is not liable for any injury to any 523
individual resulting from silica or mixed dust exposure unless 524
that individual's alleged exposure occurred while the individual 525
was at the premises owner's property.526

       (B) If exposure to silica or mixed dust is alleged to have 527
occurred before January 1, 1972, it is presumed that a premises 528
owner knew that this state had adopted safe levels of exposure for 529
silica or mixed dust and that products containing silica or mixed 530
dust were used on its property only at levels below those safe 531
levels of exposure. To rebut this presumption, the plaintiff must 532
prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the premises owner 533
knew or should have known that the levels of silica or mixed dust 534
in the immediate breathing zone of the plaintiff regularly 535
exceeded the threshold limit values adopted by this state and that 536
the premises owner allowed that condition to persist.537

       (C)(1) A premises owner is presumed to be not liable for any 538
injury to any invitee who is engaged to work with, install, or 539
remove products containing silica or mixed dust on the premises 540
owner's property if the invitee's employer holds itself out as 541
qualified to perform the work. To rebut this presumption, the 542
plaintiff must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that 543
the premises owner has actual knowledge of the potential dangers 544
of the products containing silica or mixed dust that is superior 545
to the knowledge of both the invitee and the invitee's employer.546

       (2) A premises owner that hired a contractor before January 547
1, 1972, to perform the type of work at the premises owner's 548
property that the contractor was qualified to perform is not 549
liable for any injury to any individual resulting from silica or 550
mixed dust exposure caused by any of the contractor's employees or 551
agents on the premises owner's property unless the premises owner 552
directed the activity that resulted in the injury or gave or 553
denied permission for the critical acts that led to the 554
individual's injury.555

       (3) If exposure to silica or mixed dust is alleged to have 556
occurred after January 1, 1972, a premises owner is not liable for 557
any injury to any individual resulting from that exposure caused 558
by a contractor's employee or agent on the premises owner's 559
property unless the plaintiff establishes the premises owner's 560
intentional violation of an established safety standard that is in 561
effect at the time of the exposure and that the alleged violation 562
was in the plaintiff's breathing zone and was the proximate cause 563
of the plaintiff's medical condition.564

       (D) As used in this section:565

       (1) "Threshold limit values" means that, for the years 1946 566
through 1971, the concentration of silica or mixed dust in the 567
worker's breathing zone did not exceed the following maximum 568
allowable exposure limits for an eight-hour time-weighted average 569
airborne concentration:570

       (a) Silica, free or uncombined, over forty per cent: five 571
million particles per cubic foot. For purposes of the maximum 572
allowable concentrations for silica, the free silica content is 573
the per cent of free silica in the fraction of the airborne dust 574
in the breathing zone of the worker that is smaller than five 575
microns in maximum diameter.576

       (b) Silica, free or uncombined, between twenty and forty per 577
cent: ten million particles per cubic foot. For purposes of the 578
maximum allowable concentrations for silica, the free silica 579
content is the per cent of free silica in the fraction of the 580
airborne dust in the breathing zone of the worker that is smaller 581
than five microns in maximum diameter.582

       (c) Silica, free or uncombined, between ten and twenty per 583
cent: twenty million particles per cubic foot. For purposes of the 584
maximum allowable concentrations for silica, the free silica 585
content is the per cent of free silica in the fraction of the 586
airborne dust in the breathing zone of the worker that is smaller 587
than five microns in maximum diameter.588

       (2) "Established safety standard" means that, for the years 589
after 1971, the concentration of silica or mixed dust in the 590
breathing zone of the worker does not exceed the maximum allowable 591
exposure limits for the eight-hour time-weighted average airborne 592
concentration as promulgated by the occupational safety and health 593
administration (OSHA) in effect at the time of the alleged 594
exposure.595

       (3) "Employee" means an individual who performs labor or 596
provides construction services pursuant to a construction 597
contract, as defined in section 4123.79 of the Revised Code, or a 598
remodeling or repair contract, whether written or oral, if at 599
least ten of the following criteria apply:600

       (i) The individual is required to comply with instructions 601
from the other contracting party regarding the manner or method of 602
performing services.603

       (ii) The individual is required by the other contracting 604
party to have particular training.605

       (iii) The individual's services are integrated into the 606
regular functioning of the other contracting party.607

       (iv) The individual is required to perform the work 608
personally.609

       (v) The individual is hired, supervised, or paid by the other 610
contracting party.611

       (vi) A continuing relationship exists between the individual 612
and the other contracting party that contemplates continuing or 613
recurring work even if the work is not full time.614

       (vii) The individual's hours of work are established by the 615
other contracting party.616

       (viii) The individual is required to devote full time to the 617
business of the other contracting party.618

       (ix) The individual is required to perform the work on the 619
premises of the other contracting party.620

       (x) The individual is required to follow the order of work 621
set by the other contracting party.622

       (xi) The individual is required to make oral or written 623
reports of progress to the other contracting party.624

       (xii) The individual is paid for services on a regular basis, 625
including hourly, weekly, or monthly.626

       (xiii) The individual's expenses are paid for by the other 627
contracting party.628

       (xiv) The individual's tools and materials are furnished by 629
the other contracting party.630

       (xv) The individual is provided with the facilities used to 631
perform services.632

       (xvi) The individual does not realize a profit or suffer a 633
loss as a result of the services provided.634

       (xvii) The individual is not performing services for a number 635
of employers at the same time.636

       (xviii) The individual does not make the same services 637
available to the general public.638

       (xix) The other contracting party has a right to discharge 639
the individual.640

       (xx) The individual has the right to end the relationship 641
with the other contracting party without incurring liability 642
pursuant to an employment contract or agreement.643

       Sec. 2307.90. (A) Nothing in sections 2307.84 to 2307.90 of 644
the Revised Code is intended to do, and nothing in any of those 645
sections is interpreted to do, either of the following:646

       (1) Affect the rights of any party in bankruptcy proceedings; 647

       (2) Affect the ability of any person who is able to make a 648
showing that the person satisfies the claim criteria for 649
compensable claims or demands under a trust established pursuant 650
to a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States 651
Bankruptcy Code, to make a claim or demand against that trust.652

       (B) Sections 2307.84 to 2307.90 of the Revised Code shall not 653
affect the scope or operation of any workers' compensation law or 654
veterans' benefit program or the exclusive remedy of subrogation 655
under the provisions of that law or program and shall not 656
authorize any lawsuit that is barred by any provision of any 657
workers' compensation law.658

       Sec. 2307.901. (A) A holder has no obligation to, and has no 659
liability to, the covered entity or to any person with respect to 660
any obligation or liability of the covered entity in a silica 661
claim or a mixed dust disease claim under the doctrine of piercing 662
the corporate veil unless the person seeking to pierce the 663
corporate veil demonstrates all of the following:664

       (1) The holder exerted such control over the covered entity 665
that the covered entity had no separate mind, will, or existence 666
of its own.667

       (2) The holder caused the covered entity to be used for the 668
purpose of perpetrating, and the covered entity perpetrated an 669
actual fraud on the person seeking to pierce the corporate veil 670
primarily for the direct pecuniary benefit of the holder.671

       (3) The person seeking to pierce the corporate veil sustained 672
an injury or unjust loss as a direct result of the control 673
described in division (A)(1) of this section and the fraud 674
described in division (A)(2) of this section.675

       (B) A court shall not find that the holder exerted such 676
control over the covered entity that the covered entity did not 677
have a separate mind, will, or existence of its own or to have 678
caused the covered entity to be used for the purpose of 679
perpetrating a fraud solely as a result of any of the following 680
actions, events, or relationships:681

       (1) The holder is an affiliate of the covered entity and 682
provides legal, accounting, treasury, cash management, human 683
resources, administrative, or other similar services to the 684
covered entity, leases assets to the covered entity, or makes its 685
employees available to the covered entity.686

       (2) The holder loans funds to the covered entity or 687
guarantees the obligations of the covered entity.688

       (3) The officers and directors of the holder are also 689
officers and directors of the covered entity.690

       (4) The covered entity makes payments of dividends or other 691
distributions to the holder or repays loans owed to the holder.692

       (5) In the case of a covered entity that is a limited 693
liability company, the holder or its employees or agents serve as 694
the manager of the covered entity.695

       (C) The person seeking to pierce the corporate veil has the 696
burden of proof on each and every element of the person's claim 697
and must prove each element by a preponderance of the evidence.698

       (D) Any liability of the holder described in division (A) of 699
this section for an obligation or liability that is limited by 700
that division is exclusive and preempts any other obligation or 701
liability imposed upon that holder for that obligation or 702
liability under common law or otherwise.703

       (E) This section is intended to codify the elements of the 704
common law cause of action for piercing the corporate veil and to 705
abrogate the common law cause of action and remedies relating to 706
piercing the corporate veil in silica claims and mixed dust 707
disease claims. Nothing in this section shall be construed as 708
creating a right or cause of action that did not exist under the 709
common law as it existed on the effective date of this section.710

       (F) This section applies to all silica claims and mixed dust 711
disease claims commenced on or after the effective date of this 712
section or commenced prior to and pending on the effective date of 713
this section.714

       (G) This section applies to all actions asserting the 715
doctrine of piercing the corporate veil brought against a holder 716
if any of the following apply:717

       (1) The holder is an individual and resides in this state.718

       (2) The holder is a corporation organized under the laws of 719
this state.720

       (3) The holder is a corporation with its principal place of 721
business in this state.722

       (4) The holder is a foreign corporation that is authorized to 723
conduct or has conducted business in this state.724

       (5) The holder is a foreign corporation the parent 725
corporation of which is authorized to conduct business in this 726
state.727

       (6) The person seeking to pierce the corporate veil is a 728
resident of this state.729

       (H) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise 730
requires:731

       (1) "Affiliate" and "beneficial owner" have the same meanings 732
as in section 1704.01 of the Revised Code.733

       (2) "Mixed dust," "mixed dust disease claim," "silica," and 734
"silica claim" have the same meanings as in section 2307.84 of the 735
Revised Code.736

       (3) "Covered entity" means a corporation, limited liability 737
company, limited partnership, or any other entity organized under 738
the laws of any jurisdiction, domestic or foreign, in which the 739
shareholders, owners, or members are generally not responsible for 740
the debts and obligations of the entity. Nothing in this section 741
limits or otherwise affects the liabilities imposed on a general 742
partner of a limited partnership.743

       (4) "Holder" means a person who is the holder, beneficial 744
owner, or subscriber of shares or any other ownership interest of 745
a covered entity, a member of a covered entity, or an affiliate of 746
any person who is the holder, beneficial owner, or subscriber of 747
shares or any other ownership interest of a covered entity.748

       (5) "Piercing the corporate veil" means any and all common 749
law doctrines by which a holder may be liable for an obligation or 750
liability of a covered entity on the basis that the holder 751
controlled the covered entity, the holder is or was the alter ego 752
of the covered entity, or the covered entity has been used for the 753
purpose of actual or constructive fraud or as a sham to perpetrate 754
a fraud or any other common law doctrine by which the covered 755
entity is disregarded for purposes of imposing liability on a 756
holder for the debts or obligations of that covered entity.757

       (6) "Person" has the same meaning as in section 1701.01 of 758
the Revised Code.759

       Section 2. (A) As used in this section, "exposed person," 760
"mixed dust," "mixed dust disease claim," "silica," "silica 761
claim," and "substantial contributing factor" have the same 762
meanings as in section 2307.84 of the Revised Code.763

       (B) The General Assembly acknowledges the Court's authority 764
in prescribing rules governing practice and procedure in the 765
courts of this state, as provided by Section 5 of Article IV of 766
the Ohio Constitution.767

       (C) The General Assembly hereby requests the Supreme Court to 768
adopt rules to specify procedures for venue and consolidation of 769
silica claims or mixed dust disease claims brought pursuant to 770
sections 2307.84 to 2307.90 of the Revised Code.771

       (D) With respect to procedures for venue in regard to silica 772
claims or mixed dust disease claims, the General Assembly hereby 773
requests the Supreme Court to adopt a rule that requires that a 774
silica claim or a mixed dust disease claim meet specific nexus 775
requirements, including the requirement that the plaintiff be 776
domiciled in Ohio or that Ohio is the state in which the 777
plaintiff's exposure to silica or mixed dust is a substantial 778
contributing factor.779

       (E) With respect to procedures for consolidation of silica 780
claims or mixed dust disease claims, the General Assembly hereby 781
requests the Supreme Court to adopt a rule that permits 782
consolidation of silica claims or mixed dust disease claims only 783
with the consent of all parties, and in absence of that consent, 784
permits a court to consolidate for trial only those silica claims 785
or mixed dust disease claims that relate to the same exposed 786
person and members of the exposed person's household.787

       Section 3.  If any item of law that constitutes the whole or 788
part of a section of law contained in this act, or if any 789
application of any item of law that constitutes the whole or part 790
of a section of law contained in this act, is held invalid, the 791
invalidity does not affect other items of law or applications of 792
items of law that can be given effect without the invalid item of 793
law or application. To this end, the items of law of which the 794
sections contained in this act are composed, and their 795
applications, are independent and severable.796

       Section 4. If any item of law that constitutes the whole or 797
part of a section of law contained in this act, or if any 798
application of any item of law contained in this act, is held to 799
be preempted by federal law, the preemption of the item of law or 800
its application does not affect other items of law or applications 801
that can be given affect. The items of law of which the sections 802
of this act are composed, and their applications, are independent 803
and severable.804