Section 2. (A) Notwithstanding any provision of the Revised | 21 |
Code to the contrary, until December 31, 2006, no public body | 22 |
shall use eminent domain to take, without the consent of the | 23 |
owner, private property that is not within a blighted area, as | 24 |
determined by the public body, when the primary purpose for the | 25 |
taking is economic development that will ultimately result in | 26 |
ownership of that property being vested in another private person. | 27 |
(B) Until December 31, 2006, if any public body uses eminent | 28 |
domain to take, without the consent of the owner, private property | 29 |
that is not within a blighted area, as determined by the public | 30 |
body, when the primary purpose for the taking is economic | 31 |
development that will ultimately result in ownership of that | 32 |
property being vested in another private person, each of the | 33 |
following shall apply: | 34 |
(11) One member representing the planning industry in the | 95 |
state, one member representing an Ohio labor organization, one | 96 |
member representing a statewide historic preservation organization | 97 |
that works within commercial districts, one member representing | 98 |
municipal corporations, one member representing counties, and one | 99 |
member representing townships, each appointed by the Governor; | 100 |
(2) The Task Force shall prepare and submit to the General | 117 |
Assembly by not later than December 31, 2005, a report that shall | 118 |
include the findings of its study and recommendations concerning | 119 |
the use of eminent domain and its impact on property rights and | 120 |
economic development, and by not later than April 1, 2006, a | 121 |
report that shall include findings and recommendations regarding | 122 |
the updating of state law governing eminent domain. On submission | 123 |
of the report due not later than April 1, 2006, the Task Force | 124 |
shall cease to exist. | 125 |
(E) All meetings of the Task Force are declared to be public | 129 |
meetings open to the public at all times. A member of the Task | 130 |
Force shall be present in person at a meeting that is open to the | 131 |
public in order to be considered present or to vote at the meeting | 132 |
and for the purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. | 133 |
The Task Force shall promptly prepare and maintain the minutes of | 134 |
its meetings, which shall be public records under section 149.43 | 135 |
of the Revised Code. The Task Force shall give reasonable notice | 136 |
of its meetings so that any person may determine the time and | 137 |
place of all scheduled meetings. The Task Force shall not hold a | 138 |
meeting unless it gives at least twenty-four hours advance | 139 |
notification to the news media organizations that have requested | 140 |
such notification. | 141 |
(A) On June 23, 2005, the United States Supreme Court | 144 |
rendered its decision in Kelo v. City of New London, 125 S. Ct. | 145 |
2655 (2005), which allows the taking of private property that is | 146 |
not within a blighted area by eminent domain for the purpose of | 147 |
economic development even when the ultimate result of the taking | 148 |
is ownership of the property being vested in another private | 149 |
person. As a result of this decision, the General Assembly | 150 |
believes the interpretation and use of the state's eminent domain | 151 |
law could be expanded to allow the taking of private property that | 152 |
is not within a blighted area, ultimately resulting in ownership | 153 |
of that property being vested in another private person in | 154 |
violation of Sections 1 and 19 of Article I, Ohio Constitution, | 155 |
which protect the rights of Ohio citizens to maintain property as | 156 |
inviolate, subservient only to the public welfare. Thus, the | 157 |
General Assembly finds it is necessary to enact a moratorium on | 158 |
any takings of this nature by any public body until further | 159 |
legislative remedies may be considered. | 160 |
(B) The General Assembly finds that it is a matter of | 161 |
statewide concern to enact the moratorium. The moratorium is | 162 |
necessary to protect the general welfare and the rights of | 163 |
citizens under Sections 1 and 19 of Article I, Ohio Constitution, | 164 |
and to ensure that these rights are not violated due to the Kelo | 165 |
decision. In enacting this provision, the General Assembly wishes | 166 |
to ensure uniformity throughout the state. | 167 |
Section 5. Section 2 of this act applies only to taking | 168 |
actions initiated on or after the effective date of this act. As | 169 |
used in this section, "initiated" means the adoption of a | 170 |
resolution or ordinance of necessity by the public body or filing | 171 |
of a court action, but excludes taking actions for which a | 172 |
resolution or ordinance of necessity or other official action of a | 173 |
condemning authority has been taken and public funds have been | 174 |
expended in connection with that taking action prior to the | 175 |
effective date of this act. | 176 |
Section 6. If any item of law that constitutes the whole or | 177 |
part of an uncodified section of law contained in this act, or if | 178 |
any application of any item of law that constitutes the whole or | 179 |
part of an uncodified section of law contained in this act, is | 180 |
held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other items of law or | 181 |
applications of items of law that can be given effect without the | 182 |
invalid item of law or application. To this end, the items of law | 183 |
of which the uncodified sections contained in this act are | 184 |
composed, and their applications, are independent and severable. | 185 |
Section 7. This act is hereby declared to be an emergency | 186 |
measure necessary for the immediate preservation of the public | 187 |
peace, health, and safety. The reason for the necessity is that | 188 |
the United States Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New | 189 |
London, 125 S. Ct. 2655 (2005) could allow the taking of private | 190 |
property that is not within a blighted area, ultimately resulting | 191 |
in ownership of that property being vested in another private | 192 |
person in violation of Sections 1 and 19 of Article I, Ohio | 193 |
Constitution, and, as a result, warrants a moratorium on any | 194 |
takings of this type until further legislative remedies may be | 195 |
considered. Therefore, this act shall go into immediate effect. | 196 |