|
|
To amend sections 3745.71 and 3745.72 of the Revised | 1 |
Code to extend from January 1, 2009, to January 1, | 2 |
2014, the time by which environmental audits must | 3 |
be completed in order to be within the scope of | 4 |
certain privileges and immunities that apply to | 5 |
such audits, and to declare an emergency. | 6 |
Section 1. That sections 3745.71 and 3745.72 of the Revised | 7 |
Code be amended to read as follows: | 8 |
Sec. 3745.71. (A) Except as otherwise provided in division | 9 |
(C) of this section, the owner or operator of a facility or | 10 |
property who conducts an environmental audit of one or more | 11 |
activities at the facility or property has a privilege with | 12 |
respect to both of the following: | 13 |
(1) The contents of an environmental audit report that is | 14 |
based on the audit; | 15 |
(2) The contents of communications between the owner or | 16 |
operator and employees or contractors of the owner or operator, or | 17 |
among employees or contractors of the owner or operator, that are | 18 |
necessary to the audit and are made in good faith as part of the | 19 |
audit after the employee or contractor is notified that the | 20 |
communication is part of the audit. | 21 |
(B) Except as otherwise provided in or ordered pursuant to | 22 |
this section, information that is privileged under this section is | 23 |
not admissible as evidence or subject to discovery in any civil or | 24 |
administrative proceeding and a person who possesses such | 25 |
information as a result of conducting or participating in an | 26 |
environmental audit shall not be compelled to testify in any civil | 27 |
or administrative proceeding concerning the privileged portions of | 28 |
the environmental audit. | 29 |
(C) The privilege provided in this section does not apply to | 30 |
criminal investigations or proceedings. Where an audit report is | 31 |
obtained, reviewed, or used in a criminal proceeding, the | 32 |
privilege provided in this section applicable to civil or | 33 |
administrative proceedings is not waived or eliminated. | 34 |
Furthermore, the privilege provided in this section does not apply | 35 |
to particular information under any of the following | 36 |
circumstances: | 37 |
(1) The privilege is not asserted with respect to that | 38 |
information by the owner or operator to whom the privilege | 39 |
belongs. | 40 |
(2) The owner or operator to whom the privilege belongs | 41 |
voluntarily testifies, or has provided written authorization to an | 42 |
employee, contractor, or agent to testify on behalf of the owner | 43 |
or operator, as to that information. | 44 |
(3) A court of record in a civil proceeding or the tribunal | 45 |
or presiding officer in an administrative proceeding finds, | 46 |
pursuant to this section, that the privilege does not apply to | 47 |
that information. | 48 |
(4) The information is required by law to be collected, | 49 |
developed, maintained, reported, disclosed publicly, or otherwise | 50 |
made available to a government agency. | 51 |
(5) The information is obtained from a source other than an | 52 |
environmental audit report, including, without limitation, | 53 |
observation, sampling, monitoring, a communication, a record, or a | 54 |
report that is not part of the audit on which the audit report is | 55 |
based. | 56 |
(6) The information is collected, developed, made, or | 57 |
maintained in bad faith or for a fraudulent purpose. | 58 |
(7) The owner or operator to whom the privilege belongs | 59 |
waives the privilege, in whole or in part, explicitly or by | 60 |
engaging in conduct that manifests a clear intent that the | 61 |
information not be privileged. If an owner or operator introduces | 62 |
part of an environmental audit report into evidence in a civil or | 63 |
administrative proceeding to prove that the owner or operator did | 64 |
not violate, or is no longer violating, any environmental laws, | 65 |
the privilege provided by this section is waived with respect to | 66 |
all information in the audit report that is relevant to that | 67 |
issue. | 68 |
(8)(a) The information shows evidence of noncompliance with | 69 |
environmental laws and the owner or operator fails to do any of | 70 |
the following: | 71 |
(i) Promptly initiate reasonable efforts to achieve | 72 |
compliance upon discovery of the noncompliance through an | 73 |
environmental audit; | 74 |
(ii) Pursue compliance with reasonable diligence; | 75 |
(iii) Achieve compliance within a reasonable time. | 76 |
(b) "Reasonable diligence" includes, without limitation, | 77 |
compliance with section 3745.72 of the Revised Code. | 78 |
(9) The information contains evidence that a government | 79 |
agency federally authorized, approved, or delegated to enforce | 80 |
environmental laws has reasonable cause to believe is necessary to | 81 |
prevent imminent and substantial endangerment or harm to human | 82 |
health or the environment. | 83 |
(10) Any circumstance in which both of the following apply: | 84 |
(a) The information contains evidence regarding an alleged | 85 |
violation of environmental laws and a government agency charged | 86 |
with enforcing any of those laws has a substantial need for the | 87 |
information to protect public health or safety or to prevent | 88 |
substantial
harm to property or the environment | 89 |
(b) The government agency is unable to obtain the substantial | 90 |
equivalent of the information by other means without unreasonable | 91 |
delay or expense. | 92 |
(11) The information consists of personal knowledge of an | 93 |
individual who did not obtain that information as part of an | 94 |
environmental audit. | 95 |
(12) The information is not clearly identified as part of an | 96 |
environmental audit report. For purposes of this section, clear | 97 |
identification of information as part of an environmental audit | 98 |
report includes, without limitation, either of the following: | 99 |
(a) The information is contained in a document and the front | 100 |
cover, the first page, or a comparable part of the document is | 101 |
prominently labeled with "environmental audit report: privileged | 102 |
information" or substantially
comparable language | 103 |
(b) The information is contained in an electronic record and | 104 |
the record is programmed to display or print prominently | 105 |
"environmental audit report: privileged information" or | 106 |
substantially comparable language before the privileged | 107 |
information is displayed or printed. | 108 |
(13) The information existed prior to the initiation of the | 109 |
environmental audit under division (A) of section 3745.70 of the | 110 |
Revised Code. | 111 |
(D) If the privilege provided in this section belongs to an | 112 |
owner or operator who is not an individual, the privilege may be | 113 |
asserted or waived, in whole or in part, on behalf of the owner or | 114 |
operator only by an officer, manager, partner, or other comparable | 115 |
person who has a fiduciary relationship with the owner or operator | 116 |
and is authorized generally to act on behalf of the owner or | 117 |
operator or is a person who is authorized specifically to assert | 118 |
or waive the privilege. | 119 |
(E) A person asserting the privilege provided in this section | 120 |
has the burden of proving the applicability of the privilege by a | 121 |
preponderance of the evidence. If a person seeking disclosure of | 122 |
information with respect to which a privilege is asserted under | 123 |
this section shows evidence of noncompliance with environmental | 124 |
laws pursuant to division (C)(8) of this section, the person | 125 |
asserting the privilege also has the burden of proving by a | 126 |
preponderance of the evidence that reasonable efforts to achieve | 127 |
compliance with those laws were initiated promptly and that | 128 |
compliance was pursued with reasonable diligence and achieved | 129 |
within a reasonable time. | 130 |
(F) When determining whether the privilege provided by this | 131 |
section applies to particular information, a court of record that | 132 |
is not acting pursuant to division (G) of this section, or the | 133 |
tribunal or presiding officer in an administrative proceeding, | 134 |
shall conduct an in camera review of the information in a manner | 135 |
consistent with applicable rules of procedure. | 136 |
(G)(1) The prosecuting attorney of a county or the attorney | 137 |
general, having probable cause to believe, based on information | 138 |
obtained from a source other than an environmental audit report, | 139 |
that a violation has been committed under environmental laws for | 140 |
which a civil or administrative action may be initiated, may | 141 |
obtain information with respect to which a privilege is asserted | 142 |
under this section pursuant to a search warrant, subpoena, or | 143 |
discovery under the Rules of Civil Procedure. The prosecuting | 144 |
attorney or the attorney general immediately shall place the | 145 |
information under seal and shall not review or disclose its | 146 |
contents. | 147 |
(2) Not later than sixty days after receiving an | 148 |
environmental audit report under division (G)(1) of this section, | 149 |
the prosecuting attorney or the attorney general may file with the | 150 |
court of common pleas of a county in which there is proper venue | 151 |
to bring a civil or administrative action pertaining to the | 152 |
alleged violation a petition requesting an in camera hearing to | 153 |
determine if the information described in division (G)(1) of this | 154 |
section is subject to disclosure under this section. Failure to | 155 |
file such a petition shall cause the information to be released to | 156 |
the owner or operator to whom it belongs. | 157 |
(3) Upon the filing of a petition under division (G)(2) of | 158 |
this section, the court shall issue an order scheduling an in | 159 |
camera hearing, not later than forty-five days after the filing of | 160 |
the petition, to determine if any or all of the information | 161 |
described in division (G)(1) of this section is subject to | 162 |
disclosure under this section. The order shall allow the | 163 |
prosecuting attorney or the attorney general to remove the seal | 164 |
from the report in order to review it and shall place appropriate | 165 |
limitations on distribution and review of the report to protect | 166 |
against unnecessary disclosure. | 167 |
(4) The prosecuting attorney or the attorney general may | 168 |
consult with government agencies regarding the contents of the | 169 |
report to prepare for the in camera hearing. Information | 170 |
described in division (G)(1) of this section that is used by the | 171 |
prosecuting attorney or the attorney general to prepare for the in | 172 |
camera hearing shall not be used by the prosecuting attorney, the | 173 |
attorney general, an employee or agent of either of them, or an | 174 |
agency described in division (G)(4) of this section in any | 175 |
investigation or proceeding against the respondent, and otherwise | 176 |
shall be kept confidential, unless the information is subject to | 177 |
disclosure under this section. | 178 |
(5) The parties may stipulate that information contained in | 179 |
an environmental audit report is or is not subject to disclosure | 180 |
under this section. | 181 |
(6) If the court determines that information described in | 182 |
division (G)(1) of this section is subject to disclosure under | 183 |
this section, the court shall compel disclosure under this section | 184 |
of only the information that is relevant to the proceeding | 185 |
described in division (G)(1) of this section. | 186 |
(H) Nothing in this section affects the nature, scope, or | 187 |
application of any privilege of confidentiality or nondisclosure | 188 |
recognized under another section of the Revised Code or the common | 189 |
law of this state, including, without limitation, the work product | 190 |
doctrine and attorney-client privilege. | 191 |
(I) The privilege provided by this section applies only to | 192 |
information and communications that are part of environmental | 193 |
audits initiated after March 13, 1997, and completed before | 194 |
January 1, | 195 |
in division (A) of section 3745.70 of the Revised Code. | 196 |
Sec. 3745.72. (A) The owner or operator of a facility or | 197 |
property who conducts an environmental audit of the facility or | 198 |
property and promptly and voluntarily discloses information | 199 |
contained in or derived from an audit report that is based on the | 200 |
audit and concerns an alleged violation of environmental laws to | 201 |
the director of the state agency that has jurisdiction over the | 202 |
alleged violation is immune from any administrative and civil | 203 |
penalties for the specific violation disclosed, except that where | 204 |
the disclosed violation has resulted in significant economic | 205 |
benefit to the owner or operator of the facility or property, | 206 |
there is no immunity for the economic benefit component of the | 207 |
administrative and civil penalties for that violation. An owner | 208 |
or operator asserting entitlement to such immunity has the burden | 209 |
of proving that entitlement by a preponderance of the evidence. | 210 |
(B) For the purposes of this section, a disclosure of | 211 |
information is voluntary with respect to an alleged violation of | 212 |
environmental laws only if all of the following apply: | 213 |
(1) The disclosure is made promptly after the information is | 214 |
obtained through the environmental audit by the owner or operator | 215 |
who conducts the environmental audit | 216 |
(2) A reasonable, good faith effort is made to achieve | 217 |
compliance as quickly as practicable with environmental laws | 218 |
applicable to the information disclosed | 219 |
(3) Compliance with environmental laws applicable to the | 220 |
information disclosed is achieved as quickly as practicable or | 221 |
within such period as is reasonably ordered by the director of the | 222 |
state agency that has jurisdiction
over the alleged violation | 223 |
(4) The owner or operator cooperates with the director of the | 224 |
state agency that has jurisdiction over the alleged violation in | 225 |
investigating the cause, nature, extent, and effects of the | 226 |
noncompliance | 227 |
(5) The disclosure is not required by law, prior litigation, | 228 |
or an order
by a court or a government agency | 229 |
(6) The owner or operator who makes the disclosure does not | 230 |
know or have reason to know that a government agency charged with | 231 |
enforcing environmental laws has commenced an investigation or | 232 |
enforcement action that concerns a violation of such laws | 233 |
involving the activity. | 234 |
(C) For the purposes of this section, a disclosure shall be | 235 |
in writing, dated, and hand delivered or sent by certified mail to | 236 |
the director of the state agency that has jurisdiction over the | 237 |
alleged violation, and shall contain all of the following in a | 238 |
printed letter attached to the front of the disclosure: | 239 |
(1) The name, address, and telephone number of the owner or | 240 |
operator making the disclosure; | 241 |
(2) The name, title, address, and telephone number of one or | 242 |
more persons associated with the owner or operator who may be | 243 |
contacted regarding the disclosure; | 244 |
(3) A brief summary of the alleged violation of environmental | 245 |
laws, including, without limitation, the nature, date, and | 246 |
location of the alleged violation to the extent that the | 247 |
information is known by the owner or operator; | 248 |
(4) A statement that the information is part of an | 249 |
environmental audit report and is being disclosed under section | 250 |
3745.72 of the Revised Code in order to obtain the immunity | 251 |
provided by that section. | 252 |
(D) This section does not provide immunity from the payment | 253 |
of damages for harm to persons, property, or the environment; the | 254 |
payment of reasonable costs incurred by a government agency in | 255 |
responding to a disclosure; or responsibility for the remediation | 256 |
or cleanup of environmental harm under environmental laws. | 257 |
(E) The immunity provided by this section does not apply | 258 |
under any of the following circumstances: | 259 |
(1) Within the three-year period prior to disclosure, the | 260 |
owner or operator of a facility or property has committed | 261 |
significant violations that constitute a pattern of continuous or | 262 |
repeated violations of environmental laws, environmental related | 263 |
settlement agreements, or environmental related judicial orders | 264 |
and that arose from separate and distinct events. For the purposes | 265 |
of division (E)(1) of this section, a pattern of continuous or | 266 |
repeated violations also may be demonstrated by multiple | 267 |
settlement agreements related to substantially the same alleged | 268 |
significant violations that occurred within the three-year period | 269 |
immediately prior to the voluntary disclosure. Determination of | 270 |
whether a person has a pattern of continuous or repeated | 271 |
violations under division (E)(1) of this section shall be based on | 272 |
the compliance history of the property or specific facility at | 273 |
issue. | 274 |
(2) With respect to a specific violation, the violation | 275 |
resulted in serious harm or in imminent and substantial | 276 |
endangerment to human health or the environment. | 277 |
(3) With respect to a specific violation, the violation is of | 278 |
a specific requirement of an administrative or judicial order. | 279 |
(F) The immunity provided by this section applies only to | 280 |
disclosures made concerning environmental audits initiated after | 281 |
March 13, 1997, and completed before January 1,
| 282 |
accordance with the time frames specified in division (A) of | 283 |
section 3745.70 of the Revised Code. | 284 |
(G) The immunity provided by this section applies to a person | 285 |
who makes a good faith disclosure to a state agency under this | 286 |
section even though another state agency is determined to have | 287 |
jurisdiction over an alleged violation of environmental laws | 288 |
indicated in the disclosure. | 289 |
(H) Each state agency that receives a disclosure under this | 290 |
section promptly shall record receipt of the disclosure, determine | 291 |
whether it has jurisdiction over the alleged violation of | 292 |
environmental laws indicated in the disclosure, and, if it does | 293 |
not have such jurisdiction, deliver the disclosure documents to | 294 |
the director of a state agency that has jurisdiction over the | 295 |
alleged violation. If a disclosure indicates alleged violations of | 296 |
environmental laws that are under the jurisdiction of more than | 297 |
one state agency, the state agency that first receives the | 298 |
disclosure and has jurisdiction over any of the alleged violations | 299 |
promptly shall notify the director of each state agency that has | 300 |
jurisdiction over any of such alleged violations. The director of | 301 |
each state agency that receives a disclosure under this section, | 302 |
or is notified by another state agency that the director's agency | 303 |
has jurisdiction over an alleged violation of environmental laws | 304 |
indicated in the disclosure, promptly shall deliver written notice | 305 |
of that fact by certified mail to the owner or operator who made | 306 |
the disclosure. The notice shall identify the state agency that | 307 |
sends the notice; state the name, title, address, and telephone | 308 |
number of a person in the agency whom the owner or operator may | 309 |
contact regarding the disclosure; and state the name, address, and | 310 |
telephone number of the director of any other state agency | 311 |
notified about the disclosure because that agency has jurisdiction | 312 |
over an alleged violation of environmental laws indicated in the | 313 |
disclosure. | 314 |
Section 2. That existing sections 3745.71 and 3745.72 of the | 315 |
Revised Code are hereby repealed. | 316 |
Section 3. This act is hereby declared to be an emergency | 317 |
measure necessary for the immediate preservation of the public | 318 |
peace, health, and safety. The reason for such necessity is that | 319 |
the deadline by which environmental audits must be completed in | 320 |
order to be within the scope of certain privileges and immunities | 321 |
currently is January 1, 2009, thus necessitating the immediate | 322 |
extension of that deadline in order to continue the environmental | 323 |
audit program. Therefore, this act shall go into immediate effect. | 324 |