|
|
To enact section 6111.60 of the Revised Code to | 1 |
require the Director of Environmental Protection | 2 |
to consider, to the extent allowable under the | 3 |
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, specified | 4 |
factors before issuing NPDES permits for sewerage | 5 |
systems, requiring and approving long-term control | 6 |
plans for wet weather discharges from sewerage | 7 |
systems, and enforcing provisions that Act as | 8 |
applied to sewerage systems. | 9 |
Section 1. That section 6111.60 of the Revised Code be | 10 |
enacted to read as follows: | 11 |
Sec. 6111.60. Before issuing a permit under section 6111.03 | 12 |
of the Revised Code for a national pollutant discharge elimination | 13 |
system permit for discharges from a sewerage system, requiring and | 14 |
approving a long-term control plan for wet weather discharges from | 15 |
a sewerage system, or enforcing the Federal Water Pollution | 16 |
Control Act as applied to sewerage systems, the director of | 17 |
environmental protection, to the extent allowable under the | 18 |
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, shall consider all of the | 19 |
following, as applicable, notwithstanding any other provisions of | 20 |
this chapter to the contrary: | 21 |
(A) Limitations on the ability of an applicant for a permit | 22 |
or of a permittee to pay for or to secure money to pay for a | 23 |
required project; | 24 |
(B) An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost of a | 25 |
long-term control plan; | 26 |
(C) An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost of specific | 27 |
wet weather flow control technologies; | 28 |
(D) An evaluation of the impact of a long-term control plan | 29 |
on the environment as a whole and of the promotion of alternative | 30 |
control options that will minimize the impact on the environment; | 31 |
(E) Reducing the economic impacts on an applicant for a | 32 |
permit or on a permittee, other state and local government | 33 |
entities, and residents of the state; | 34 |
(F) Allowing for reasonable flexibility in the implementation | 35 |
of a long-term control plan when the plan would impose a | 36 |
disproportionate financial hardship compared to its environmental | 37 |
benefits; | 38 |
(G) Giving preference, when proposed by an applicant for a | 39 |
permit or by a permittee, to control options that comply with the | 40 |
presumption approach performance criteria established in the | 41 |
combined sewer overflow control policy adopted under 33 U.S.C. | 42 |
1342 and that demonstrate significant pollution reduction rather | 43 |
than mandating specific designs; | 44 |
(H) Allowing adequate time and flexibility for implementation | 45 |
of the schedule specified in the long-term control plan; | 46 |
(I) Factors specified in the combined sewer overflow control | 47 |
policy adopted under 33 U.S.C. 1342 that may ease the financial | 48 |
burdens of implementing a long-term control plan, including, but | 49 |
not limited to, small sewerage system considerations, the | 50 |
attainability of water quality standards, and the development of | 51 |
wet weather standards; | 52 |
(J) All other requirements imposed on an applicant for a | 53 |
permit or on a permittee to undertake capital improvements under | 54 |
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Safe Drinking Water | 55 |
Act as defined in section 6109.01 of the Revised Code, this | 56 |
chapter, Chapter 6109. of the Revised Code, or rules adopted under | 57 |
either chapter. | 58 |