Sub.
S.B. 131
126th General Assembly
(As Passed by the Senate)
Sens. Mumper, Dann, Zurz, Schuler
BILL SUMMARY
· Prohibits the sale, offering for sale, purchase, and use of alcohol vaporizing devices, and prescribes criminal penalties for violations.
· Allows opened bottles of wine that are purchased at restaurants to be transported in motor vehicles under specified conditions, notwithstanding the general prohibitions of the Opened Container Law.
· Revises the law governing the allocation of state liquor stores or agencies by clarifying that the notification requirements and procedures apply to the assignment of agency store contracts and by applying those requirements and procedures to the relocation of agency stores.
· Eliminates certain population quota restrictions for C and D liquor permits.
· Eliminates certain procedures and requirements governing the transfer of location of C and D liquor permits.
· Changes from no less than 5,000 to no less than 1,500 the membership requirement for a nonprofit organization that owns or operates a fine arts museum to qualify for the issuance of a D-5h liquor permit.
CONTENT AND OPERATION
The bill prohibits a person from selling or offering for sale an alcohol vaporizing device (sec. 4301.65(B)). "Alcohol vaporizing device" means a machine or other device that mixes beer or intoxicating liquor with pure oxygen or any other gas to produce a vaporized product for the purpose of consumption by inhalation (sec. 4301.65(A)). A person who violates this prohibition generally is guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree. But, for a second or subsequent violation occurring within a period of five consecutive years after the first violation, a person who violates this prohibition is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree. (Sec. 4301.99(J).)
The bill further prohibits a person from purchasing or using an alcohol vaporizing device (sec. 4301.65(C)). A person who violates this prohibition is guilty of a minor misdemeanor (sec. 4301.99(A)).
Existing law prohibits a person from having in the person's possession an opened container of beer or intoxicating liquor in various circumstances. A violation of the prohibition is a minor misdemeanor (sec. 4301.99(A)). One of the circumstances is while operating or being a passenger in or on a motor vehicle on any street, highway, or other public or private property open to the public for purposes of vehicular travel or parking. Another of the circumstances is while being in or on a stationary motor vehicle on any street, highway, or other public or private property open to the public for purposes of vehicular travel or parking. (Sec. 4301.62(B)(4) and (5).)
However, with regard to both of the circumstances mentioned above, existing law excludes a person who pays for a chauffeured limousine, or a guest of the person, from the opened container prohibition when all of the following apply (sec. 4301.62(D)):
(1) The person or guest is a passenger in the limousine.
(2) The person or guest is located in the limousine, but is not occupying a seat in the front compartment where the operator is located.
(3) The limousine is located on any street, highway, or other public or private property open to the public for purposes of vehicular travel or parking.
The bill also excludes from the opened container prohibition an opened bottle of wine that was purchased from the holder of a permit that authorizes the sale of wine for consumption on the premises where sold if both of the following apply (sec. 4301.62(E)):
(1) The opened bottle of wine is securely resealed by the permit holder or an employee of the permit holder before the bottle is removed from the premises. The bottle must be secured in such a manner that it is visibly apparent if the bottle has been subsequently opened or tampered with.
(2) The opened bottle of wine that is resealed is stored in the trunk of a motor vehicle or, if the motor vehicle does not have a trunk, behind the last upright seat or in an area not normally occupied by the driver or passengers and not easily accessible by the driver.
Existing law generally authorizes five state liquor stores or agencies to be established in each county. Additional ones may be established in a county based on certain population requirements. But, both of these authorizations are subject to local option election limitation. (Sec. 4301.17(A)(1).)
Also under existing
law, when an agency store contract is
proposed or when an existing agency store contract is assigned to a
new agent, before entering into the contract or consenting to the assignment,
the Division of Liquor Control must notify the legislative authority of the
municipal corporation in which the agency store will be located, or the board
of county commissioners and the board of township trustees of the county and
the township in which the agency store will be located if the store will be
located outside the corporate limits of a municipal corporation, of the
proposed contract or assignment. The
Division also must provide an opportunity to officials or employees of the
municipal corporation, or the county and township, for a complete hearing on
the advisability of entering into the contract or consenting to the
assignment. When the Division sends
notice to the legislative authority of the political subdivision, it must
notify, by certified mail or by personal service, the chief peace officer of
the political subdivision, who may appear and testify, either in person or
through a representative, at any hearing held on the advisability of entering
into the contract or consenting to the assignment. (Sec. 4301.17(B).)
The bill retains this law governing proposed
new agency store contracts and the assignment of existing agency store
contracts, and expands and applies it to relocations of agency
stores. Thus, the Division, before
consenting to any relocation, also must notify the applicable legislative
authority of a political subdivision(s) and provide an opportunity for a
hearing when an existing agency proposes to relocate or when an existing
agency is relocated and assigned within the jurisdiction of the applicable
political subdivision. (Sec.
4301.17(B).)
Under existing law, if a proposed agency
store would be located within 500 feet of a school, church, library, public
playground, or township park, the Division cannot enter into an agency store
contract until it has notified the authorities in control of the school,
church, library, playground, or park and provided them with an opportunity for
a complete hearing on the advisability of entering into the contract. The bill retains this law and applies it to
the assignment of an agency store contract and to the relocation of an agency
store. Thus, if the assignment of an
agency store contract or the relocation of an agency store would be located
within 500 feet of a school, church, library, public playground, or township
park, the Division cannot enter into an agency store contract until it has
notified the applicable authorities and provided them with an opportunity for a
complete hearing on the advisability of entering into the contract. (Sec. 4301.17(B).)
Also, under existing law, if an agency
store located within 500 feet of a school, church, library, public
playground, or township park is operating under an agency contract, the
Division may consent to the assignment of that contract to operate an agency
store at the same location, but it cannot consent to an assignment until it has
notified the applicable authorities and provided them with an opportunity for a
complete hearing on the advisability of consenting to the assignment. The bill retains those provisions but
specifies that, if an agency store located within 500 feet of a school, church,
library, public playground, or township park is operating under an agency
contract, the Division may consent to its relocation. The bill also authorizes the Division to consent to the
assignment of an existing agency store contract simultaneously with the
relocation of the agency store. In any
such assignment or relocation, the assignee and the location are subject to the
same requirements that the existing location met at the time that the contract
was first entered into as well as any additional requirements imposed by the
Division in rules adopted by the Superintendent of Liquor Control. However, as under existing law governing the
assignment of an agency store contract, the Division cannot consent to the relocation
of an agency store until it has notified the applicable authorities and
provided them with an opportunity for a complete hearing on the advisability of
consenting to the relocation. (Sec.
4301.17(B).)
Under existing law, no more than one of each type of C permit (sales for off-premises consumption) or D permit (sales for on-premises consumption and, under certain instances, sales for off-premises consumption) authorizing beer, wine, mixed beverages, and/or spirituous or intoxicating liquor retail sales can be issued to any one person, firm, or corporation in any county having a population of less than 25,000, and no more than one of each type of C or D permit can be issued to any one person, firm, or corporation for any additional 25,000 or major fraction thereof in any county having a population greater than 25,000, provided that, in the case of D-3, D-3a, D-4, and D-5 permits, no more than one permit can be issued to any one person, firm, or corporation in any county having a population of less than 50,000, and no more than one such permit can be issued to any one person, firm, or corporation for any additional 50,000 or major fraction thereof in any county having a population greater than 50,000. (Sec. 4303.29(B).)
The bill eliminates all of those restrictions. But, it does not affect the population quota restrictions that govern the number of C-1, C-2, D-1, D-2, D-3, D-4, and D-5 permits that can be issued within a municipal corporation or the unincorporated territory of a township. (Secs. 4303.29(B) and 4303.292(C).)
Current law prohibits the Division of Liquor Control from permitting the transfer of location of a C or D permit until it investigates the proposed new premises and finds that the transfer would not be detrimental for any of the reasons that are grounds for refusal to issue, transfer the ownership or location of, or renew any retail liquor permit. In an order permitting or denying such a transfer of location, the Division must state in writing, if it permits the transfer, why the transfer would not be detrimental and, if it denies the transfer, why the transfer would be detrimental. In making the finding, the Division must consider, in addition to the results of its own investigation, any testimony presented in a hearing that is held for the applicable board of county commissioners, board of township trustees, or legislative authority of a municipal corporation for the issuance, transfer of ownership, or transfer of location of a liquor permit. An order permitting or denying the transfer of location of a C or D permit is a public record and must be open to public inspection at the office of the Division. The Division must provide a copy of such an order to any person upon request and may charge a reasonable fee not to exceed the cost of copying and delivering the order. The bill eliminates all of those provisions. (Sec. 4303.273--outright repealed in Section 2 of the bill.)
Existing law allows the D-5h liquor permit to be issued to any nonprofit organization that is exempt from federal income taxation under subsection 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and that owns or operates a fine arts museum, community arts center, or community theater, each of which must meet specified requirements. The bill revises the requirements for the issuance of the D-5h permit to a fine arts museum. Instead of requiring that a nonprofit organization that owns or operates a fine arts museum have no less than 5,000 bona fide members possessing full membership privileges as under existing law, the bill requires the nonprofit organization to have no less than 1,500 bona fide members possessing full membership privileges. (Sec. 4303.181(H).)[1]
HISTORY
|
ACTION |
DATE |
|
|
|
|
Introduced |
04-21-05 |
|
Reported, S. Agriculture |
03-29-06 |
|
Passed Senate (31-0) |
03-29-06 |
s0131-ps-126.doc/kl
[1] This same change was enacted by Am. Sub. H.B. 530 of the 126th General Assembly and takes effect June 30, 2006.