Fiscal Note & Local Impact Statement
127 th General Assembly of Ohio
BILL: |
DATE: |
|||||
STATUS: |
SPONSOR: |
|||||
LOCAL IMPACT
STATEMENT REQUIRED: |
|
|||||
CONTENTS: |
To authorize municipal corporations to recoup certain unpaid hazard
or nuisance abatement costs by attaching a lien against a property owner's
primary residence |
·
No
direct fiscal effect on the state.
LOCAL
GOVERNMENT |
FY 2008 |
FY 2009 |
FUTURE YEARS |
|
Counties—Auditors and
Recorders |
||||
Revenues |
- 0 - |
- 0 - |
- 0 - |
|
Expenditures |
Potential increase |
Potential increase |
Potential increase |
|
Municipalities |
||||
Revenues |
Potential gain equaling or
offsetting the amount of nuisance abatement expenses |
Potential gain equaling or
offsetting the amount of nuisance abatement expenses |
Potential gain equaling or
offsetting the amount of nuisance abatement expenses |
|
Expenditures |
- 0 - |
- 0 - |
- 0 - |
|
Note: For most local governments, the fiscal year is the calendar year. The school district fiscal year is July 1 through June 30.
·
The
bill permits municipal corporations to recoup the cost of abating a nuisance
property by reporting any unpaid amount to the county auditor where the owner's
primary residence is located. In turn,
the county auditor would record this amount as a lien against the property
owner's residence. This new authority
would potentially allow municipalities to recoup hazard and nuisance abatement
expenses more quickly.
·
The
bill contains some additional record-keeping requirements that might minimally
increase administrative costs for county auditors and recorders.
|
Alternative method for recouping nuisance
abatement costs
Under current law, there are
two ways that a municipality can recoup the costs of abating nuisance
properties. The first method allows
municipalities to add any unpaid costs as a charge against the property on the
tax list. Once on the tax list, the
costs constitute a lien against the property, and are to be collected as
property taxes are collected. To have
the costs placed on the tax list, the clerk of the municipal corporation's
legislative authority certifies the costs to the county auditor. The second method is for municipalities to
initiate a civil action against the property owner for collection of these
charges.
Under the new authority in
the bill, municipalities would be able to collect unpaid amounts by allowing
these costs to become a lien against the nuisance property owner's primary
residence. The general effect would be
that municipalities could potentially recover their nuisance and hazard
abatement costs more quickly. Another
result is that municipalities might undertake abatement projects that they
might otherwise have not.
For example, an individual
living in the city of Delaware could own a nuisance property in the city of
Columbus. After Columbus has abated the
property, notified the property owner, and complied with the required 30-day
notice period, the city would be able to certify the unpaid abatement costs to
the Delaware County Auditor. After
notification by certified mail, the charges become a lien on the property in
Delaware County. Once the Delaware
County Auditor collects the unpaid amounts, that office must remit the amount
collected to Columbus.
Property interest filing requirements
The
bill contains record-keeping provisions that might add some minimal new
administrative costs for county auditors and county recorders. It does so by requiring owners of real
property and other persons with recorded interests in real property to file and
maintain their names and addresses with the county auditor. The purpose of the filing is to compile a
record enabling any notices "related to the ownership, taxation,
condition, or use" of the property to be mailed to the person. The requirement applies to any person with
an interest in real property "by deed, mortgage, plat, or other instrument
of writing" recorded with the county recorder. The filing must be made on a form to be provided by the county
auditor. The county recorder is
required to maintain a list of the names and addresses filed with the county
auditor, together with a cross-reference between the property and the corresponding
name and address. The bill does not
specifically indicate that any filing fees are associated with these filings,
leading to the potential for minimal new administrative costs.
LSC fiscal
staff: Terry Steele,
Budget Analyst